Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Danny Salazar


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Dochalo said:

maybe that's the difference then because I seriously doubt Eppler has written Heaney off and plans to get a third starter in case he's injured.  

they are very much counting on him to be the guy he was in 2018.  

I also don't think they're gonna add 52m in payroll.  

finally, if they were going to spend that much, I'd rather have a good catcher than a guy like Quintana

Yeah... and I’m guessing you’re right about how they view Heaney and I believe it will be our downfall. 
 

Guess we’ll see

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CanadianHalo said:

Yeah... and I’m guessing you’re right about how they view Heaney and I believe it will be our downfall. 
 

Guess we’ll see

I think the PTSD from 2019 is still in full effect on all of our internal candidates.  Even if Heaney doesn't go back to his 2018 form, there is more help from Barria, Canning, Suarez and Sandoval than people think.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dochalo said:

we're just not gonna add three reliable arms from outside the org.  Eppler has already said as much that he's targeting two.  That third guy, if there is one, is likely to be a project or a leftover at a minimum.  

Then we won't compete. Canning, Ohtani and Heaney wont provide enough innings in the 3 through 5 slots, and Peters, Suarez, Barria and Pena should be depth pieces only (not counted on to make 20 to 25 percent of the team's starts).

To have a realistic chance of competing, the rotation needs to look something like this: (1) Cole; (2) Bumgarner/Wheeler; (3) Ohtani; (4) Heaney; (5) Porcello; (6) Canning. Anything short of that and the team is again golfing in Hawaii during October.

Remember, one of the pieces we bring in merely replaces Skaggs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wopphil said:

Then we won't compete. Canning, Ohtani and Heaney wont provide enough innings in the 3 through 5 slots, and Peters, Suarez, Barria and Pena should be depth pieces only (not counted on to make 20 to 25 percent of the team's starts).

To have a realistic chance of competing, the rotation needs to look something like this: (1) Cole; (2) Bumgarner/Wheeler; (3) Ohtani; (4) Heaney; (5) Porcello; (6) Canning. Anything short of that and the team is again golfing in Hawaii during October.

Remember, one of the pieces we bring in merely replaces Skaggs.

Do you think in order to compete your 3-5 guys have to average 150 plus innings?  I see no reason they can’t all be between 130-160 innings.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wopphil said:

Then we won't compete. Canning, Ohtani and Heaney wont provide enough innings in the 3 through 5 slots, and Peters, Suarez, Barria and Pena should be depth pieces only (not counted on to make 20 to 25 percent of the team's starts).

To have a realistic chance of competing, the rotation needs to look something like this: (1) Cole; (2) Bumgarner/Wheeler; (3) Ohtani; (4) Heaney; (5) Porcello; (6) Canning. Anything short of that and the team is again golfing in Hawaii during October.

Remember, one of the pieces we bring in merely replaces Skaggs.

remember.  we didn't have Ohtani last year.   So he's essentially Skaggs replacement and he's better.  

that's gonna cost 55-60m per year of added payroll and we haven't added any help at catching.  

You could be right about how adding two won't be enough.  I'm a little more hopeful of our in house guys I guess.  

I also wouldn't expect Cole AND another top tier guy.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We can get away with two guys if they are Cole and Wheeler and they give us 210 and 180 innings, respectively. And if Canning, Ohtani and Heaney stay mostly healthy, making 75 starts between them and averaging 140 to 150 innings, then we compete.

But neither of these scenarios is happening. 

I am not saying you guys are wrong about the Angels' plans. I, also, expect them to bring in only two pitchers. But I dont think that will be enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wopphil said:

We can get away with two guys if they are Cole and Wheeler and they give us 210 and 180 innings, respectively. And if Canning, Ohtani and Heaney stay mostly healthy, making 75 starts between them and averaging 140 to 150 innings, then we compete.

But neither of these scenarios is happening. 

I am not saying you guys are wrong about the Angels' plans. I, also, expect them to bring in only two pitchers. But I dont think that will be enough.

if Cole and Weaver each make 30 starts and do what you've said and Canning, Ohtani and Heaney do what you've said, that's 840 innings with an avg of 6.2ip per start.  If you avg. 4ip in the remaining 27 starts, that's 948 ip from our starters.  

That would have led all of baseball this year.  

I think you are over estimating how many innings a rotation needs to pitch in order for a team to be successful.  

If you get two guys that avg 190, 120 from ohtani in 22 starts, you have made up a huge deficit from last year.  

It was just so bad that I think people are thinking we need so much more than we really do.  As an example, the 2017 rotation wasn't very good and the top innings guys were at 181, 142, 117, 113.  And the team finished 20th in starter innings.  

If you don't believe that Canning, Heaney or Sandoval are very good then I get it.  but two adding two guys and Ohtani will make a huge difference.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the record, I dont think it is unrealistic to want the team to target Cole (35 per), Wheeler (20 per), and Boyd (5 per). Yes, it is a ton of money, but it still keeps us under the tax threshold (and yes, I understand the difference between actual payroll and CBA payroll, as well as the team's approach to both).

If the team wants to win the west, radical moves are necessary. Incremental improvement is unlikely to be enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dochalo said:

remember.  we didn't have Ohtani last year.   So he's essentially Skaggs replacement and he's better.  

that's gonna cost 55-60m per year of added payroll and we haven't added any help at catching.  

You could be right about how adding two won't be enough.  I'm a little more hopeful of our in house guys I guess.  

I also wouldn't expect Cole AND another top tier guy.  

And he wont put up more than 150innings.

 

We dont need a 3 and a bullpen day start from him.

 

He's coming back from TJ surgery and should not be counted on to put up consistent innings and quality starts back to until the 2nd half of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...