Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Roe v. Wade and the new SC Justice


Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, mtangelsfan said:

You aren't going to get any kind of response since those senators should have been fired for not giving Garland a hearing.

One shouldn't have to do with the other though.  If they keep at this, we won't have a SCOTUS in a couple of decades.

My point was politics was a good enough reason but checking if a dude is a rapist isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So many questions here...

If Swetnick was of legal age and went to these parties where minors were being raped, and failed to report these crimes, isn't that a crime in itself?

What is a college sophomore doing hanging around with 15 and 16 year olds?

Why did she continue to attend these parties??

If these 'rape parties' went on every weekend and involved multiple girls, did any of them eventually get pregnant? How many sexually transmitted diseases? How many weeks or even years did these gang rape events continue? Are we talking about potentially hundreds of victims, and nobody but Swetnick has reported this, 36 years later on the eve of a Supreme Court confirmation?? Nobody else ever mentioned these orgies? Families in the dark about all this? It just defies belief and common sense.

 

Edited by fan_since79
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, nate said:

Recent trends should suggest that the women should be given the benefit of the doubt.

 

someone disagrees . . . 

On December 12, 2017 at 10:35 PM, calscuf said:

If any of you pansies support women here you need your balls removed.  It's a Facking textbook witch hunt at this point.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, fan_since79 said:

Gorsuch replaced Scalia. Balance on the court remains the same.

Kavanaugh would cement a 5-4 conservative majority for the first time in decades and threaten the progressive/socialist agenda in a big way.

Which Supreme Court justices are socialist?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...