Hillary Hates Taxes and other Hillaryous things

[NrM]

It's prob best for most republicans if hillary wins tbh

[Rico]

Just now, Geoff said:

 

For Trump or all Republicans?

 

 

Both.  Republicans have had a latino problem for some time now.  Instead of addressing it, they have gone "full retard" on the issue and will lose senate/house seats because of it.

[Spirit]

18 minutes ago, Rico said:

Both.  Republicans have had a latino problem for some time now.  Instead of addressing it, they have gone "full retard" on the issue and will lose senate/house seats because of it.

So how will this manifest itself? 

Lose the House?  If so, by how much?  Lose the Senate?  If so, by how much?

 

 

 

[RallyMo]

19 minutes ago, Rico said:

Both.  Republicans have had a latino problem for some time now.  Instead of addressing it, they have gone "full retard" on the issue and will lose senate/house seats because of it.

This is absolutely true.

 

I don't think that Republic

Just now, Geoff said:

So how will this manifest itself? 

Lose the House?  If so, by how much?  Lose the Senate?  If so, by how much?

 

 

 

I don't think it will cause them to lose much this year, but I do believe a Trump presidency would hasten the trend here in Texas towards being purple and eventually blue. The demographics here are changing. If the Republicans lose this state and its 38 heretofore guaranteed electoral votes, it could eventually be crippling. Trump may end up helping to mobilize a sleeping giant of a voting bloc here. I'm not so sure that many have considered the potential long term national consequences of a Texas shift. It might be a big deal. With that said, Texas Latinos as a group do skew more conservative than Latinos do elsewhere.

Additionally, lol Baylor. They're getting owned.

[Rico]

They will likely hold strong in the House.  They have gerrymandered the process so that they can't lose.

The Senate is a toss up.  PA, WI, NV, NC, NH could flip blue.

[Spirit]

29 minutes ago, Rico said:

They will likely hold strong in the House.  They have gerrymandered the process so that they can't lose.

The Senate is a toss up.  PA, WI, NV, NC, NH could flip blue.

They could flip to blue?  I thought it was going to be a bloodbath. 

Come on, man!  Stick with the bold prediction! 

 

 

 

 

[Spirit]

Time to pull the tax exemption from these crazy Libs.

 

 

[Lou]

it is absolutely amazing that an election against a nimrod like Trump isn't a complete root 

our election process sucks ass 

[Spirit]

Wait ... when you have a rally, aren't you supposed to have someone who likes you do the introductions?

 

 

[Rico]

[NrM]

2 hours ago, Geoff said:

Wait ... when you have a rally, aren't you supposed to have someone who likes you do the introductions?

 

 

lol there was like 50 people in attendance. 

[Tank]

That was excellent. 

[Jay]

17 hours ago, Rico said:

http://heavy.com/news/2016/11/arizona-early-voting-results-election-2016-turnout-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-hispanic-latino-black-white-down-up/

About 1.4 million Arizonans have voted early, and according to AZCentral, the Arizona Democratic party is reporting that about 12 percent of those ballots came from Hispanic voters. This is nearly double the turnout of 2012, when by this point, six percent of the ballots cast early came from Hispanics.

Hillary does really well with uneducated brown people.

 

[Glen]

So you're implying Hispanics are uneducated? Careful, man. That closet door is creeping open.

[Blarg]

Careful man, statistics will drown you in this pool.

[Spirit]

83 percent of uneducated, non-white voters support Clinton compared to only 10 per for Trump.

 

 

 

[Amazing Larry]

21 minutes ago, Geoff said:

83 percent of uneducated, non-white voters support Clinton compared to only 10 per for Trump.

Yo you's being racialist. 

 

[Glen]

2 hours ago, Geoff said:

83 percent of uneducated, non-white voters support Clinton compared to only 10 per for Trump.

 

 

 

 

 

Source?

Not doubting you,I'd just like to see the source.

[Spirit]

44 minutes ago, Glen said:

 

Source?

Not doubting you,I'd just like to see the source.

 

It's Bloomberg, so take it for what it's worth.

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-09-08/trump-beats-clinton-least-educated-whites

 

 

[Glen]

4 minutes ago, Geoff said:

 

It's Bloomberg, so take it for what it's worth.

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-09-08/trump-beats-clinton-least-educated-whites

 

 

 

 

So they're both doing well with their particular sect of uneducated voters, but Hillary has the slight edge overall.  

Election 2016.

[Amazing Larry]

Clinton Foundation funded Chelsea's wedding?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/52046

[Blarg]

I'm guessing that cost more than some lawyer fees.

[nate]

Comey: Nothing criminal in new emails.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/06/fbi-director-hillary-clinton-email-investigation-criminal-james-comey

[Rico]

This just in, apparently the Clinton foundation may have laundered some money with the help of a Nigerian Prince.  The FBI has announced it will be looking into this matter further.

[JAHV76]

25 minutes ago, Rico said:

This just in, apparently the Clinton foundation may have laundered some money with the help of a Nigerian Prince.  The FBI has announced it will be looking into this matter further.

Wait I received an email from a Nigerian prince asking for my account number to wire some funds they needed to move to the US.