Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Elon Musk buys Twitter for $44 billion


Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, St1ck said:

Parody is protected free speech. Let's see how Mr "free speech absolutist" handles this.

Impersonation has been against policy on Twitter nearly since it's inception. Parody is allowed with certain requirements.

https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/twitter-impersonation-and-deceptive-identities-policy

https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/parody-account-policy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Lhalo said:

Impersonation has been against policy on Twitter nearly since it's inception. Parody is allowed with certain requirements.

https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/twitter-impersonation-and-deceptive-identities-policy

https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/parody-account-policy

Wait, are you telling me that enforcement of website guidelines and terms of service is not in fact an infringement on free speech?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, St1ck said:

Wait, are you telling me that enforcement of website guidelines and terms of service is not in fact an infringement on free speech?

A private website? WTF are you talking about?

My problem with Twitter before was that they would only selectively enforce their rules which would favor liberals over conservatives. They also deceptively shadow banned users or banned them on false accusations. There was nothing unconstitutional about it. It was just obviously very one sided and probably caused a lot of people to stay off the platform.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Lhalo said:

A private website? WTF are you talking about?

My problem with Twitter before was that they would only selectively enforce their rules which would favor liberals over conservatives. They also deceptively shadow banned users or banned them on false accusations. There was nothing unconstitutional about it. It was just obviously very one sided and probably caused a lot of people to stay off the platform.

Good, so we're clear enforcing terms of service has nothing to do with free speech.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...