Trumped

[2112]

10 hours ago, Taylor said:

Another example of a fine American exercising their freedom of speech.

 

 

I must not follow the right people on Parlor.  Mine was rather dull.

[Jason]

1 hour ago, tdawg87 said:

That's basically it. It's stupid but figured people would react to it.

There were pictures with cops taking selfies with the "protesters". 

If they were “protesters” that forced their way into the Capitol then that’s just really stupid. If it was actual peaceful protestors following the rules, outside, then it’s not really an issue. Also, thank you for making us look at two dudes kiss. Are you telling me you couldn’t have found something similar with women?

Edited January 10, 2021 by Jason

[Crampknees]

2 hours ago, tdawg87 said:

In the new defunding the police campaign this department had no breathalyzer's budgeted and found a more compassionate way to check for DUI.  

[tdawg87]

57 minutes ago, Jason said:

If they were “protesters” that forced their way into the Capitol then that’s just really stupid. If it was actual peaceful protestors following the rules, outside, then it’s not really an issue. Also, thank you for making us look at two dudes kiss. Are you telling me you couldn’t have found something similar with women?

No.

[AngelsLakersFan]

13 hours ago, failos said:

Isn’t this the dem argument? BLM protesters would’ve been shot down but they let the racist white people into the Capitol? They blew it. Period.

Far too many arguments skip right over the possibility for incompetence to be the reason for something when it almost always is.

[gotbeer]

I'm confused.  What does the left want?  To shoot unarmed people, or not to shoot unarmed people?

[Vegas Halo Fan]

6 hours ago, Jason said:

It’s easy to cherry pick things like this and then say the entire platform should be abolished. Use stuff like this, find the person who wrote it and charge them criminally with making the threat. Nobody will argue that making direct threats like this is protected under the 1A. Banning Parler’s entire platform is suppressing speech. 

The companies who carry Parler are private companies. They have their own rules of conduct. If hate speech and/or condoning violence violate their terms of service, then they are within their rights to ban them. Members of Parler have the right to say whatever they want. They do not have the right to have it carried, or facilitated, on a given platform.

[gotbeer]

3 minutes ago, Vegas Halo Fan said:

The companies who carry Parler are private companies. They have their own rules of conduct. If hate speech and/or condoning violence violate their terms of service, then they are within their rights to ban them. Members of Parler have the right to say whatever they want. They do not have the right to have it carried, or facilitated, on a given platform.

Weird.  I see BLM and Antifa condoning violence all the time on Twitter.  Yet they never seem to be banned.

[AngelsLakersFan]

Just now, gotbeer said:

Weird.  I see BLM and Antifa condoning violence all the time on Twitter.  Yet they never seem to be banned.

This is anecdotal. Plenty of crazy people get away with saying stuff online, that doesn't mean it is a reflection of bias.

[Redondo]

Gab gaining 10,000 users per hour, CEO claims, after Trump's permanent Twitter suspension

 

 

[Vegas Halo Fan]

3 minutes ago, gotbeer said:

Weird.  I see BLM and Antifa condoning violence all the time on Twitter.  Yet they never seem to be banned.

If they are doing this, they should also be banned.

That said, they have not carried out an attack against the United States Government. Trump supporters who are ducking and covering are trying to blame the Capitol attack on Antifa, who (a) do not have the organization or numbers to orchestrate something that size, (b) would not go to the trouble to stand at a rally where the President, his son and his attorney whipped them into a frenzy, and (c) are probably would not stop and pose for photos as they were ransacking the Capitol. 

The plans of StopTheSteal were made online. They included what we saw on January 6 (they used the word "invasion" to describe it), and quick evacuations probably stopped it from being a total bloodbath. Their plans included killing police, federal employees and members of Congress.

[gotbeer]

No Justice, No Peace.  

Acceptable to the left.  Maybe the right should start saying it.

[tdawg87]

There's no evidence whatsoever that there's a bias against one side on social media. 

[Lou]

lol

[Vegas Halo Fan]

4 minutes ago, gotbeer said:

No Justice, No Peace.  

Acceptable to the left.  Maybe the right should start saying it.

They had their day in court, multiple times. They have repeatedly lost, because they had no case to begin with. Their own attorneys admitted as much when the cases went before judges.

[St1ck]

How many interviews has Trump even done since the election?  I can only think think of one. Has he had a single press conference? 

[Jason]

17 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

There's no evidence whatsoever that there's a bias against one side on social media. 

Maybe the people you follow don’t get banned so you’ll never notice?

[tdawg87]

15 minutes ago, Jason said:

Maybe the people you follow don’t get banned so you’ll never notice?

I don't follow anybody.

@Glen got a facebook post censored recently.

[Vegas Halo Fan]

I don't find Twitter to be worth my time, so if anything was going on there, I wouldn't notice it. I have an account, but I check it maybe every 60 days or so.

[Jason]

1 hour ago, Vegas Halo Fan said:

I don't find Twitter to be worth my time, so if anything was going on there, I wouldn't notice it. I have an account, but I check it maybe every 60 days or so.

It is a hot mess 

[Vegas Halo Fan]

2 hours ago, gotbeer said:

Weird.  I see BLM and Antifa condoning violence all the time on Twitter.  Yet they never seem to be banned.

I do have to call bullshit on anyone following BLM or Antifa closely enough to see them "condoning violence all the time on Twitter". So when and where is the next riot?

[Jason]

3 hours ago, tdawg87 said:

No.

At least this is slightly more acceptable than the lemon party shit 

[Redondo]

[tdawg87]

3 minutes ago, Redondo said:

Gentleman, I believe we now have the most RE: RE: RE: RE: post in Angelswin history.

[tdawg87]

7 minutes ago, Jason said:

At least this is slightly more acceptable than the lemon party shit 

To be fair I haven't posted it in its entirety. Oddly enough, the censored one got deleted and the cutoff one didn't (you can still see the kissing dude's junk).

Don't tell Blarg.