Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

2020 Election


2020 Election  

63 members have voted

  1. 1. Which do you value more?

    • The U.S. Constitution and the will of the voters
      3290
    • #Overturn!
      8


Recommended Posts

NJ Democrat won't resign after tweet about Abraham Lincoln assassination, Trump

A New Jersey Democrat is refusing to resign after a post-Election Day tweet referencing Abraham Lincoln's assassination surfaced Wednesday.  

Chris Emrich, a member of Collingswood's Democratic Committee, made what he claims was a "stupid" remark when responding to critics of The Lincoln Project, a committee of Republicans against the reelection of President Trump, according to a copy of the tweets obtained by Fox News.

After a Twitter user dubbed the group the "Stinkin' Project" Emrich replied, "need a John Wilkes Booth Project imo," according to a copy of the tweets. Emrich's tweet is a reference to the man who assassinated former President Abraham Lincoln at Ford's Theatre in April 1865.

The Twitter accounts are protected and can be seen only by the user's followers. Emrich's comment came around 8:45 a.m. Wednesday, according to the time stamp. 

Shortly after the comments surfaced, however, Camden County's Democratic Committee called for his resignation because his tweet was both "disgraceful" and "dangerous."

"The idea that someone would apparently threaten the life of a sitting President, regardless of party, is unconscionable, dangerous, and antithetical to our democratic values," Camden County Democratic Committee Chairman James Beach told Fox News in a statement.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be so much more fun if the electors all voted on how their district voted rather than the all in approach that wipes any non majority votes away. California has 55 votes but not all areas of California are deep blue. It would certainly change the complexion of the election if that vote was split up. Some states allow it, I think all should.

Sure would make election night even more of a circus. In this case Election Night plus 3. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can nearly 70 million people in your country vote for that man. I just cannot comprehend it. Truly the most pathetic speech I’ve ever heard from a man that had no place ever holding the office of your great country. Stay safe out there, hopefully he hasn’t incited too much violence with his irresponsible and dangerous lies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...