Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Trumped


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • UndertheHalo

    2985

  • Lou

    2898

  • Jason

    2765

  • Taylor

    2692

10 hours ago, Blarg said:

This is a lot of work by the Dems to force Trump to admit he banged a porn star. 

He could have saved everyone the work by simply telling the truth and said I banged her.  Isn't that the whole defense, they are liars?  He's the mothership of liars for fucks sake. Shit, never mind. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Crampknees said:

He could have saved everyone the work by simply telling the truth and said I banged her.  Isn't that the whole defense, they are liars?  He's the mothership of liars for fucks sake. Shit, never mind. 

 

It doesn’t need to be re-said but it is funny that the party of conservative values and religion has rallied behind the dude that fucks porn stars while his wife is pregnant.

That never stops being hilarious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Jason said:

Yes but they have ZERO credibility as they are known liars and Daniles fucks dudes for money. Witnesses like that are a terrible idea. 

Does Trump have credibility?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, cals said:

It doesn’t need to be re-said but it is funny that the party of conservative values and religion has rallied behind the dude that fucks porn stars while his wife is pregnant.

That never stops being hilarious.

I guess in the new Trump bible men create the God. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, St1ck said:

Probably because they are the two main people involved in this outside of Trump. Cohen is a piece of shit but he got disbarred in connection to actions he did for Trump. 

These also weren't the only two witnesses. Others are the National Enquirer owner, Hope Hicks, Trump's former assistant, the lawyer that negotiated the deal, and Trump Org's former controller.

Sham trial. Sorry but all the shit you guys are throwing at the wall isn’t sticking and is helping Trump at the polls. He’s grateful to you libs though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Amazing Larry said:

Sham trial. Sorry but all the shit you guys are throwing at the wall isn’t sticking and is helping Trump at the polls. He’s grateful to you libs though. 

So do you think the claim that he used campaign money to pay off Stormy Daniels is a lie?

Or do you think it's the truth, but it shouldn't be a crime?

What if the jury finds him not guilty? Is it still a sham trial?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Amazing Larry said:

Sham trial. Sorry but all the shit you guys are throwing at the wall isn’t sticking and is helping Trump at the polls. He’s grateful to you libs though. 

You're amazing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Taylor said:

So do you think the claim that he used campaign money to pay off Stormy Daniels is a lie?

Or do you think it's the truth, but it shouldn't be a crime?

What if the jury finds him not guilty? Is it still a sham trial?

Who cares? It’s not a crime. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Taylor said:

What if the jury finds him not guilty? Is it still a sham trial?

Well, if they find him not guilty then it kinda points to it being a wrongful prosecution by nature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Blarg said:

Well, if they find him not guilty then it kinda points to it being a wrongful prosecution by nature.

Then he should sue the Grand Jury, since they’re the ones who voted to indict him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, cals said:

Then he should sue the Grand Jury, since they’re the ones who voted to indict him.

You know the old saying, a grand jury would indict a ham sandwich.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Blarg said:

Well, if they find him not guilty then it kinda points to it being a wrongful prosecution by nature.

So if they find him guilty, it points to it being a rightful prosecution, yes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Taylor said:

Tell me, Jason. Who selects the jury in a trial?

Trump’s dumb lawyers. He doesn’t hire the best ones but this current chick is kind of hot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Jason said:

Trump’s dumb lawyers. He doesn’t hire the best ones but this current chick is kind of hot. 

Whatever shit hole law career she had will be snubbed out just touching him, she will never be paid a cent, but the hopes for the FOX News career are still in play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...