Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Angels sign Carlos Estevez (2 years, $13.5 million)


mmc

Recommended Posts

  • mmc changed the title to Angels sign Carlos Estevez

Good for you @totdprods!

Quote

 

Nope, just somewhere between a guess and a hunch. This is the ‘what move would you make next’ thread after all. Perry traditionally moves quick and bullpen is probably the next to address.

The Angels can give him the opportunity to close and up his value for a future deal, or they can lock him up for a year or two now at money less than a closer would need. Hits 100. Big dude. Wouldn’t take a huge commitment but could clearly fill a need. It feels like it would align with Anderson, Renfroe, and Urshela - not the flashiest name, a few question marks, but a reasonable commit and cost. 

He‘s clearly affected by pitching in Coors.

158 innings at Coors with a 5.57 ERA, allowing more than a hit per inning (169) and walking 75 against 160 K.

Away? 143 IP, 3.51 ERA, 138 hits, only 43 BB against 152 K. That’s a dramatic difference in BB/9, and a significant difference in H/9 and K/9, suggesting his stuff truly just plays a lot better out of Coors.

After a rough start to ‘22, he had a very solid June through end of year too.

New assistant pitching coach Bill Hezel has liked/retweeted a few Estevez-related things over the years that Driveline metrics liked, things specifically pointing to potential for a big step-up away from Coors. Hezel’s whole Twitter is just filled with stuff mostly about Ohtani, Sandoval, and Cobb preceding his hire, plus lots of mentions about Baltimore’s Dillon Tate and Spenser Watkins. Jharel Cotton (a current free agent) also mentioned a lot. Wouldn’t be surprised if these are guys we’re targeting. Could do our annual Baltimore trade and try to get Tate too.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jsnpritchett said:

It's still 3.51 outside of Coors, which is solid, but certainly not spectacular for a reliever.  K rate is again good, not great.  Here's his Baseball Savant profile from this year.  It's, uh, not great.

image.png

That’s also taking into account half his games at Coors where his stuff obviously suffers. It doesn’t mean it will reverse significantly but simply getting him away from there could tick a lot of stuff much more the right direction. His BBs go way up, hits allowed go way up, and strikeouts way down at home. And not just a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jsnpritchett said:

It's still 3.51 outside of Coors, which is solid, but certainly not spectacular for a reliever.  K rate is again good, not great.  Here's his Baseball Savant profile from this year.  It's, uh, not great.

image.png

that chase rate tho 🤮

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • mmc changed the title to Angels sign Carlos Estevez (2 years, $14 million)
1 minute ago, totdprods said:

That’s also taking into account half his games at Coors where his stuff obviously suffers. It doesn’t mean it will reverse significantly but simply getting him away from there could tick a lot of stuff much more the right direction. His BBs go way up, hits allowed go way up, and strikeouts way down at home. And not just a bit.

I think the key thing is that it appears he has to rather useful weapons - his FB and slider, both of which seem to grade well.  Possibly some tweaking is needed in terms of his usage, but I do think the biggest factor will be taking him out of Coors, as you basically said.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fwiw, the lionintexas dude on Twitter also called out Estevez and Angels pretty specifically a few days back, and today said they were prioritizing bullpen above all else and we’re getting their guy this week. 

A lot of what they’ve said is pretty safe for predictions but it hasn’t been terribly inaccurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...