Zach Davies

[HaloRed]

Bump? Don't know how to navigate while I haven't been in here for awhile.  Zac Gallen asks for too much, but Davies might be an option. Although, I can't figure the direction of this team right now, given their inconsistency.  Still, if they might be vying, and want to bolster for some kind of direction under the current contractual conditions, Davies might be a good one to put into their rotatation. 

[Taylor]

The Thunder has returned!

[HaloRed]

https://www.mlb.com/news/mlb-trade-deadline-candidates-on-the-rise  Davies in there, 6.5 back of WC, Rendon out for the season.  Still, they need some sense of direction at this juncture while it just sux watching the usual season after season. 

[Taylor]

He actually wouldn't be a bad target if the Angels were about 5 games above .500 (instead of the record they are now). But because they're on the cusp of being totally done for the season it wouldn't make sense to trade prospects for a No. 3 type starter.

[Angels 1961]

15 hours ago, Taylor said:

He actually wouldn't be a bad target if the Angels were about 5 games above .500 (instead of the record they are now). But because they're on the cusp of being totally done for the season it wouldn't make sense to trade prospects for a No. 3 type starter.

What makes sense is Thaiss at 2B or 3B so we can put the 2B in OF

[mmc]

 

[Angel Dog and Beer]

Time to stop chasing Zach.