Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. Become a Premium Member today for an ad-free experience. 

     

IGNORED

Elon Musk buys Twitter for $44 billion


Recommended Posts

On 12/4/2022 at 7:14 PM, St1ck said:

So what happened?

They released information regarding the government suppression in the Hunter Biden laptop story. What’s funny is that an ex FBI lawyer who was working for Twitter tried to suppress that release as well. Musk fired him today. 

https://nypost.com/2022/12/06/elon-musk-fires-twitter-lawyer-james-baker-over-hunter-biden/amp/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Lhalo said:

They released information regarding the government suppression in the Hunter Biden laptop story. What’s funny is that an ex FBI lawyer who was working for Twitter tried to suppress that release as well. Musk fired him today. 

https://nypost.com/2022/12/06/elon-musk-fires-twitter-lawyer-james-baker-over-hunter-biden/amp/

 

I’m ready for the fauci drop. Blarg is going to be crushed when he finds out we were right on the lab leak , hydro, and vaccine efficacy/ safety 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Lhalo said:

They released information regarding the government suppression in the Hunter Biden laptop story. What’s funny is that an ex FBI lawyer who was working for Twitter tried to suppress that release as well. Musk fired him today. 

https://nypost.com/2022/12/06/elon-musk-fires-twitter-lawyer-james-baker-over-hunter-biden/amp/

 

This is Musk’s version of “draining the swamp”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Lhalo said:

They released information regarding the government suppression in the Hunter Biden laptop story. What’s funny is that an ex FBI lawyer who was working for Twitter tried to suppress that release as well. Musk fired him today. 

https://nypost.com/2022/12/06/elon-musk-fires-twitter-lawyer-james-baker-over-hunter-biden/amp/

 

Musk trying to make something out of nothing. You know who else didn't find the story credible? Fox News. 

Fox News Reportedly Turned Down Hunter Biden Laptop Story First
https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-reportedly-turned-down-hunter-biden-laptop-story-first

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, St1ck said:

Musk trying to make something out of nothing. You know who else didn't find the story credible? Fox News. 

Fox News Reportedly Turned Down Hunter Biden Laptop Story First
https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-reportedly-turned-down-hunter-biden-laptop-story-first

 

The laptop story alone isn’t the issue. A political party colluding with a large social media platform like Twitter to suppress speech to benefit them in an election is the story. Seems like something all of us should have an issue with 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jason said:

The laptop story alone isn’t the issue. A political party colluding with a large social media platform like Twitter to suppress speech to benefit them in an election is the story. Seems like something all of us should have an issue with 

Oh?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, St1ck said:

Musk trying to make something out of nothing. You know who else didn't find the story credible? Fox News. 

Fox News Reportedly Turned Down Hunter Biden Laptop Story First
https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-reportedly-turned-down-hunter-biden-laptop-story-first

 

This will shock a lot of libs. Fox News ownership isn’t conservative and is very much part of the ruling clash establishment. Murdock is a globalist but he isn’t above playing the role for profit. Fox News knows when to let off the gas in search of truth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Kotchman said:

This will shock a lot of libs. Fox News ownership isn’t conservative and is very much part of the ruling clash establishment. Murdock is a globalist but he isn’t above playing the role for profit. Fox News knows when to let off the gas in search of truth. 

It's Murdoch. Now guess who owns the NYPost? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jason said:

Yep. These social media companies should not be colluding with government officials for their political gain. Especially when it’s to control flow of information they don’t like. Doesn’t matter what party it is.

The Biden campaign was not a government official. What they asked Twitter not to publish were hacked Hunter Biden dick pics. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, St1ck said:

It's Murdoch. Now guess who owns the NYPost? 

That was my point. His media empire has the resources to fully expose the corruption in this country yet they  disappear at crucial times. Globally he has consistently supported climate change socialism world wide. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, St1ck said:

The Biden campaign was not a government official. What they asked Twitter not to publish were hacked Hunter Biden dick pics. 

Don’t dismiss these pics. Those pics likely eliminate Hunter as potentially being the “Big Guy”. So now we’re down to Joe and his brother. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Kotchman said:

That was my point. His media empire has the resources to fully expose the corruption in this country yet they  disappear at crucial times. Globally he has consistently supported climate change socialism world wide. 

The NYPost are the ones that keep running the Hunter Biden story so as usual you make no sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, St1ck said:

The Biden campaign was not a government official. What they asked Twitter not to publish were hacked Hunter Biden dick pics. 

Ok, then they did it to influence an election. Spin it however you want but the shit Twitter was doing was not good 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jason said:

Ok, then they did it to influence an election. Spin it however you want but the shit Twitter was doing was not good 

You didn't even read what you're commenting on. You're doing the standard Bumper Sticker Jason posts. Pictures of Hunter Biden's dick wouldn't change the election. From Musk's own bombshell reveal it was them deciding whether to post hacked nude photos. FFS Jason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, St1ck said:

You didn't even read what you're commenting on. You're doing the standard Bumper Sticker Jason posts. Pictures of Hunter Biden's dick wouldn't change the election. From Musk's own bombshell reveal it was them deciding whether to post hacked nude photos. FFS Jason.

https://variety.com/2022/digital/news/twitter-files-blocked-ny-post-hunter-biden-censor-1235448481/amp/

Defend their actions all you want but you and I both know it is not as simple as a dick pic. We are politically opposite so of course we have a different view of this and neither of us is changing each others mind. It’s still cool though. I’m still hoping that Musk ruins the company and it folds completely but I doubt that will happen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, St1ck said:

The NYPost are the ones that keep running the Hunter Biden story so as usual you make no sense. 

I said he knows how to play the role. An article is one thing. Turning his entire world wide resources and exposing the truth is another. That laptop has been around the block. Do you believe Murdoch hasn’t had all the goods from day 1 ? He basically dupes Americans into believing his right leaning companies are legit in their beliefs. Their insane profits fuel his liberal agenda world wide. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Lhalo said:

St1ck in full defense mode haha. 

I’m amazed how many libs think fox and rupy are are freedom loving patriots. He’s a card carrying climate change socialist and his kids are worse. He’s just wise enough to occasionally speak out against the woke bs. It’s good for ratings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Jason said:

Yep. These social media companies should not be colluding with government officials for their political gain. Especially when it’s to control flow of information they don’t like. Doesn’t matter what party it is.

It's illegal to post nude photos of someone without their consent.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...