Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Trumped


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • UndertheHalo

    2985

  • Lou

    2898

  • Jason

    2764

  • Taylor

    2687

9 minutes ago, cals said:

None of them stand a chance.  It would be nice to see a Republican show some balls and stand up to Trump.  I guess Christie kind of is, but he’s really fat so he’s gonna be an easy target for Trumps bullying.

I have no idea what any of the other Republican candidates could possibly do to make anyone want to vote for them.  Only one I somewhat like is Vivek and he's still leagues away from Trump

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, cals said:

None of them stand a chance.  It would be nice to see a Republican show some balls and stand up to Trump.  I guess Christie kind of is, but he’s really fat so he’s gonna be an easy target for Trumps bullying.

Does his moose knuckle count? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cals said:

None of them stand a chance.  It would be nice to see a Republican show some balls and stand up to Trump.  I guess Christie kind of is, but he’s really fat so he’s gonna be an easy target for Trumps bullying.

Christie is “kind of” standing up to Trump like you’re “kind of” an asshole. It’s literally his entire schtick. The never-Trump republican crowd is pretty much the only group he appeals to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is really just pointless crap. This only affects the Colorado primary as far as I know, not the general.

its quite an interesting precedent though. Since the state primaries are run by the state, can the federal Supreme Court really tell them what they can do with their private party (republican) selection process?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Make Angels Great Again said:

This is really just pointless crap. This only affects the Colorado primary as far as I know, not the general.

its quite an interesting precedent though. Since the state primaries are run by the state, can the federal Supreme Court really tell them what they can do with their private party (republican) selection process?

Oh now you bring up sTaTeS riGhTs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

You don't actually support states rights. None of you fags do. Only when it's convenient, otherwise go nationwide abortion ban!

I don’t think you understand. I just said that I’m guessing states rights will allow Colorado to do this. I’m guessing the Supreme Court won’t step in.

which is whatever, I don’t give a fuck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...