Tyler Chatwood?

[mulwin444]

Undersore?  Is that a hemorrhoid?

[HaloNArizona]

Maybe we can trade Ianetta for Chatwood?

[AngelArcher]

OP, do you speak the way you write? That would be awesome. 

[Jeff Williams]

21 hours ago, Jeff Williams said:

How big of an underscore is Chatwood on the SP market?  If contenders aren't about for him now, maybe the Angels should take a shot at him.  Would they do it for Joe Smith? Probably!

 

[Jeff Williams]

Joe Smith is a rental, so his value would be down, to correct myself from before.  They should keep Smith over Street for setup.  They would have too to take back most of Street's remaining money owed for any value in return, the more I look at it.  Run with Street and Smith for the bullpen season remainder but plan on Cam as the closer!  

Mulwin, in the meantime, just seems to mull over with correcting my fat fingers.      

 

Edited July 22, 2016 by Jeff Williams
Fat fingers from tying on a fn phone

[mulwin444]

Actually, no, I addressed my opinion earlier in the thread...

So, to reiterate, trading Tyler Chatwood, a talented cost controlled starting pitcher, makes zero sense for the Rockies, who are in dire need of additional talented, cost controlled starting pitching.

[Jeff Williams]

Don't you mean, ELABORATE, from that post before?

[Taylor]

lol

[Jeff Williams]

On July 20, 2016 at 11:42 AM, mulwin444 said:

Exactly...why would they want a broken Street?

...that's all you said, right?  

[mulwin444]

9 minutes ago, Jeff Williams said:

...that's all you said, right?  

I thought it was obvious that by, quoting Scott, and saying "Exactly...", I was essentially sharing the same thought.  Sorry for the confusion and discomfort this must have caused you.

Its a shit trade...better? 

[m0nkey]

This is one weird thread 

[Jeff Williams]

1 hour ago, Taylor said:

lol

Yeah, he really came into the ring as the Buddha Band-Aid Belly on that one!!

[Jeff Williams]

19 minutes ago, m0nkey said:

This is one weird thread 

Your name hasn't changed to c@t, yet?

[Jeff Williams]

1 hour ago, mulwin444 said:

I thought it was obvious that by, quoting Scott, and saying "Exactly...", I was essentially sharing the same thought.  Sorry for the confusion and discomfort this must have caused you.

Its a shit trade...better? 

Aka a Melania, or for the matter, Mulwin. 

[mulwin444]

2 minutes ago, Jeff Williams said:

Aka a Melania, or for the matter, Mulwin. 

You're on a roll, dude!

[Jeff Williams]

2 hours ago, mulwin444 said:

I thought it was obvious that by, quoting Scott, and saying "Exactly...", I was essentially sharing the same thought.  Sorry for the confusion and discomfort this must have caused you.

Its a shit trade...better? 

Okay, so now you've REITERATED upon someone speaking for you.  And, you seem to be missing the overall message I've suggested with my OP: 

it's trade deadline time and the Angels need another SP to make a run at this.  Whether they might leverage upon the demand through their relievers, I simply threw Street out there to begin with.  While Chatwood, might have some UNDERSCORE  to work from about getting. 

I'm surveying while you MULL OVER what somebody else has to say.  How come you haven't changed your name?!     

 

[mulwin444]

Just now, Jeff Williams said:

Okay, so now you've REITERATED upon someone speaking for you.  And, you seem to be missing the overall message I've suggested with my OP: 

it's trade deadline time and the Angels need another SP to make a run at this.  Whether they might leverage upon the demand through their relievers, I simply threw Street out there to begin with.  While Chatwood, might have some UNDERSCORE  to work from about getting. 

I'm surveying while you MULL OVER what somebody else has to say.  How come you haven't changed your name?!     

 

Thumbs up...would read again

[m0nkey]

I wouldn't 

[m0nkey]

40 minutes ago, Jeff Williams said:

Okay, so now you've REITERATED upon someone speaking for you.  And, you seem to be missing the overall message I've suggested with my OP: 

it's trade deadline time and the Angels need another SP to make a run at this.  Whether they might leverage upon the demand through their relievers, I simply threw Street out there to begin with.  While Chatwood, might have some UNDERSCORE  to work from about getting. 

I'm surveying while you MULL OVER what somebody else has to say.  How come you haven't changed your name?!     

 

There are two sides to a trade. Why would Colorado, who has no reason to trade for a reliever, trade chatwood for street?

[Mark68]

4 hours ago, mulwin444 said:

Actually, no, I addressed my opinion earlier in the thread...

So, to reiterate, trading Tyler Chatwood, a talented cost controlled starting pitcher, makes zero sense for the Rockies, who are in dire need of additional talented, cost controlled starting pitching.

Especially ones who seem to survive Coors Field.

[Jeff Williams]

1 hour ago, m0nkey said:

There are two sides to a trade. Why would Colorado, who has no reason to trade for a reliever, trade chatwood for street?

Man, that c@t is running with the blinkers on! 

[Blarg]

Jeff,  you are random phrase generator. I know it all makes some sort of sense in your head but no one else is getting it. 

[Jeff Williams]

1 hour ago, Mark68 said:

Especially ones who seem to survive Coors Field.

1/2 a good season for the Rockies after coming off TJ surgery might make him available at the same time, too.  The Rockies getting a reliever for him, not necessarily the Angels, that they can immediately flip onto this trade deadline frenzied market with, might yield for a desirable return to them for Chatwood.  The Angels may or may not be able to play upon that angle toward getting him, but the circumstances make for a 3-way scenario.      

[IEAngelsfan]

6 hours ago, Jeff Williams said:

Yeah, he really came into the ring as the Buddha Band-Aid Belly on that one!!

I just found my new phrase that I'll be using frequently to describe people who irritate me.

[Jeff Williams]

3 hours ago, IEAngelfan said:

I just found my new phrase that I'll be using frequently to describe people who irritate me.

Love it, I could be but won't be, one of them!