Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

Angels recall Mickey Moniak, option Jake Lamb


mmc

Recommended Posts

So this is my understanding of that situation.

Sheep go baaa, and since lambs are baby sheep the also go baaa only maybe at a higher pitch. But this high pitched baaa gives Agent Starling nightmares that give her a good story to tell Doctor Lecter so they can develop a quid pro quo and decide that between Urshela and Drury they can manage at 1B for a few days while they wait on Walsh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Second Base said:

Cabbage?

Well why not give him a little look?  Encouragement for him and he doesn’t need to play more than Lamb did unless he does well.  and he goes back down when Walsh comes back regardless.

Edited by Revad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, arch stanton said:

So this is my understanding of that situation.

Sheep go baaa, and since lambs are baby sheep the also go baaa only maybe at a higher pitch. But this high pitched baaa gives Agent Starling nightmares that give her a good story to tell Doctor Lecter so they can develop a quid pro quo and decide that between Urshela and Drury they can manage at 1B for a few days while they wait on Walsh

That's mighty fine work, right there. That's the kind of analysis that sets AW apart from the rest of baseball Fandom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Second Base said:

Cabbage?

 

4 hours ago, Revad said:

Well why not give him a little look?  Encouragement for him and he doesn’t need to play more than Lamb did unless he does well.  and he goes back down when Walsh comes back regardless.

He is not on the 40 man so you'd have to make a spot for him.....also, if Walsh is close to being activated, it might not make a lot of sense.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DMVol said:

 

He is not on the 40 man so you'd have to make a spot for him.....also, if Walsh is close to being activated, it might not make a lot of sense.....

Good point.  Someone from the 40 man then but you bring someone up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Angels 1961 said:

I think it's Moniak time

There is no way, without doubt, that it's Moniak or Adell time. Are you ever tired of being wrong about literally everything?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Angels 1961 said:

So can halos keep Lamb on the farm rest of this year? Jeff, getting back to your favorite subject why was Philips not in as PR on Wednesday in 9th? Why was his elite defense not used in game on Monday night? 

I believe he can stay in AAA as long as they keep him on the 40-man roster. If they bring him back they would not be able to option him again because the 45-day window would be closed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Trendon said:

Wonder what the corresponding move is.

It has to be a position player, and the only player on the 40-man not playing last night was Moniak.

So Moniak or an external addition?

Could be claiming Ruf on waivers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...