Roe v. Wade and the new SC Justice

[Rico]

10 minutes ago, Jason said:

What part of her testimony proves true?

That there was a party on July 1st that matches her description with all the boys she named there.

[fan_since79]

Kavanaugh will probably be confirmed but he'll be hounded for years by the crazies.

 

[Blarg]

2 hours ago, Rico said:

1.  She was able to name two of his drinking buddies. Judge is easy to guess, but how would she know about PJ Smyth?

Coached, she couldn't remember if there were four guys in the room until Kavanaugh was nominated. 

2 hours ago, Rico said:

2. There is a party on Kavanaugh's own calendar that perfectly matches the party she describes. They can't say no such gathering ever happened, it's right there.  He provided the evidence. 

But she didn't because she has no recollection of where and when. Bringing doubt to if she was even there. 

2 hours ago, Rico said:

3. They had a mutual friend, squi.  He was at this July 1st party.  With him there it makes it more likely she was at this party too, because otherwise why would she go to a party with complete strangers?

This has zero value. This mutual friend has never made a statement of either being at the party in question or seeing Ford at the party. 

2 hours ago, Rico said:

4. The July 1st party matches her testimony that she saw Judge working at Safeway 6-8 weeks later.  In his book Judge states he worked at Safeway for two weeks in August of '82.

Judge's part time job has nothing to do with events 8 weeks earlier. 

2 hours ago, Rico said:

5. There are three other women that have also made credible allegations against Kavanaugh of similar nature. It's not he said she said. It's he said vs she said, she said, she said, she said.

 None of those allegations are in connection to Ford's testimony.

2 hours ago, Rico said:

6. Each one of the accusers have provided statements from people that knew of the allegations before Kavanaugh was nominated in July. 

None of these allegations surfaced until two weeks ago which points to them being nothing more that a political ploy.

2 hours ago, Rico said:

7. As hard as they have tried Republicans have been unable to discredit these women's allegations. 

8. Meanwhile Kavanaugh has told multiple falsehoods while under oath.

9. Plenty of evidence that proves he has had an alcohol problem well into his adulthood. This is a key element to these allegations. 

10. He has no real defense outside of,  "I don't and they don't remember."

Tired of this game. This is all horseshit. Ford's entire testimony was contrived bullshit that was feed to her as the story to tell from Feinstein office. Just enough lie to be unprovable. No substance that wasn't derived and fabricated by association without real evidence of being at the same place at the same time. 

You are a true believer. 

 

[Tank]

1 hour ago, Rico said:

Absolute proof doesn't need to be established. Again, this isn't a criminal trial. They are not voting to lock him up in jail. They are voting on if he should get a job promotion. Things considered hearsay at a trial are permissible in a background check. 

One thing we know about him is that he has lied over and over again. 

and exactly how relevant is any of this today? are you the same person now that you were at 15-17? would any stupid things you did during that time be relevant today?

all the focus of his nomination is on this and not his work as a judge. it's political BS.

[Tank]

1 hour ago, Rico said:

What part of her testimony about the event has been proven false?  Because there are parts of his testimony that are easy to refute. 

it's all hearsay. what parts of her testimony have been proven true? there's no physical evidence, no video - it's all he-said-she-said.

[Blarg]

10 minutes ago, calscuf said:

I always tell my clients in preparation for providing testimony:  Difficult or embarrassing truth is much either to deal with than any lie, regardless of how unimportant you think it is.  You lie, you destroy your credibility.  

Too bad you weren't advising Dr. Ford. 

[Blarg]

Thanks but I have plenty. 

[Blarg]

Yes.

[fan_since79]

Is cals a lawyer? He spoke about counseling his clients in regards to testimony.

If he is a lawyer, how does he have the time to be on this board practically 24/7? 

 

Edited October 5, 2018 by fan_since79

[Blarg]

2 minutes ago, calscuf said:

PM me if you have extras.

I get a special deal on the pills. 90 daily dosage supply for about $23 shipping included. For most people a 30 day supply costs between $380 - $600. This is Cialis name brand, not a Canadian pharmacy generic brand. 

[Blarg]

3 minutes ago, fan_since79 said:

Is cals a lawyer? He spoke about counseling his clients in regards to testimony.

If he is a lawyer, how does he have the time to be on this board practically 24/7? 

 

Ever hear of big payouts? Lawyers get 30% or more. You don't have to win many cases at that rate.

[Blarg]

1 minute ago, calscuf said:

 

Your doc say it was to help the prostate?

Ever hear of bladder cancer? Nasty little thing and if you get to stage two it has to be removed and along with it goes the prostate. 

It's a long story but I was lucky to have had my surgery over at USC Norris. They performed a cystoprostatectomy which left me with a neo bladder and nerve sparing on the prostate removal. Without that no amount of drugs would have helped with erection dysfunction. 

This last September I hit the halfway point on the 5 year cancer survival. Yay me. There are lifestyle adjustments which are reasonably liveable considering circumstances could have been much worse.

[Blarg]

I'm on a 24/7 every four hour schedule. It's to maintain the Neo Bladder not as much as need to urinate. 

[Lou]

46 minutes ago, calscuf said:

Let’s not forgot that most of my contributions aren’t even contributing to the actual discussions, rather it’s mostly immature jokes and nonsense.

[Lou]

will you two please get a (bath)room?

[Blarg]

Hey, it's not like this thread hadn't needed flushing a long time ago.

[Lou]

58 minutes ago, Blarg said:

Ever hear of big payouts? Lawyers get 30% or more. You don't have to win many cases at that rate.

so cals is the Pujols of AW? 

[Lou]

[Jason]

9 hours ago, fan_since79 said:

Kavanaugh will probably be confirmed but he'll be hounded for years by the crazies.

 

Meh, the left will find something else to be mad about. He’ll move on with his life

[Amazing Larry]

Exactly. Something shiny will grab their attention before the midterms.

[Adam]

It was a valiant effort by the libs. They saved face with their base. The losers in this country will totally riot over this. 

[Blarg]

20 to 30 years from now, when Kavanaugh steps down, I wonder what kind of a candidate will step forward. Maybe Rico will have his law degree from the University of Samoa by then. 

[Amazing Larry]

About time someone called out Soros.

 

[Adam]

....in the basement with love! that's pretty good.

[Taylor]

14 minutes ago, Lhalo said:

About time someone called out Soros.

 

Trump's Twitter is a constant Fw: fw: fw: fw: channel.