Trumped

[tdawg87]

Face

[St1ck]

5 minutes ago, BackUpTheTruck said:

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/30/joe-biden-impeachment-witness-109730

Good for me, but not for thee . . .

Lock him up! Lock him up!

[tdawg87]

BUTT posted a legitimate news source. He must be sick.

[St1ck]

1 minute ago, tdawg87 said:

BUTT posted a legitimate news source. He must be sick.

Alternate title of article: Career Long Politician Contradicts Prior Opinion To Benefit His Current Position.

[the dude abides]

CPAC lol.

[tdawg87]

Now that's more like it. That unpatriotic POS actually wanted to see witnesses in a trial. Hang him!

[Blarg]

“The Senate may dismiss articles of impeachment without holding a full trial or taking new evidence. Put another way, the Constitution does not impose on the Senate the duty to hold a trial,” Biden wrote at the time.

Imagine if the Republicans in the Senate just dismissed the Articles presented by the House, the uproar that would insue. Honestly I would love to have seen it just for the political meltdowns that would occur in the media. 

And here. 

[tdawg87]

1 minute ago, Blarg said:

“The Senate may dismiss articles of impeachment without holding a full trial or taking new evidence. Put another way, the Constitution does not impose on the Senate the duty to hold a trial,” Biden wrote at the time.

Imagine if the Republicans in the Senate just dismissed the Articles presented by the Senate, the uproar that would insue. Honestly I would love to have seen it just for the political meltdowns that would occur in the media. 

And here. 

So, did the Senate dismiss the articles during Clinton's impeachment trial? Jw

[tdawg87]

1 minute ago, BackUpTheTruck said:

I wonder if Mitt would be okay with a disgruntled former staffer writing a book for millions of dollars testifying against him in his own impeachment trial.

Of course not.

At least he got impeached from CPAC.

Well no, he wouldn't, because he's a republican. 

Also it doesn't matter what the President wants. Imagine if everyone being tried for a crime got to choose the witnesses. That would be pretty fucking awesome. Like sucking dick.

[St1ck]

13 minutes ago, BackUpTheTruck said:

 

Did they not invite Susan Collins as well? Or does she get a pass because she faces a tough election in a purple state?

 

PS

I don't actually expect you to answer this, because all you do is post a stupid article like this once a month, and then hit the eject button.

[Blarg]

4 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

So, did the Senate dismiss the articles during Clinton's impeachment trial? Jw

Nope. 

[Blarg]

2 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

Well no, he wouldn't, because he's a republican. 

Also it doesn't matter what the President wants. Imagine if everyone being tried for a crime got to choose the witnesses. That would be pretty fucking awesome. Like sucking dick.

The house had chosen and called their witnesses and rested their case. 

[tdawg87]

Just now, Blarg said:

Nope. 

Which was correct. Biden is wrong. 

[St1ck]

8 minutes ago, Blarg said:

“The Senate may dismiss articles of impeachment without holding a full trial or taking new evidence. Put another way, the Constitution does not impose on the Senate the duty to hold a trial,” Biden wrote at the time.

Imagine if the Republicans in the Senate just dismissed the Articles presented by the House, the uproar that would insue. Honestly I would love to have seen it just for the political meltdowns that would occur in the media. 

And here. 

Would you like to see videos of Lindsey Graham, and McConnell from that same trial?

[Blarg]

1 minute ago, tdawg87 said:

Which was correct. Biden is wrong. 

Nope. He is constitutionally correct. 

[St1ck]

Just now, BackUpTheTruck said:

She gets a pass for putting Kavanaugh on the supreme court.

Yes! Old boofing Brett. Did you know he went to Yale?

[tdawg87]

Just now, Blarg said:

The house had chosen and called their witnesses and rested their case. 

Right, and those witnesses were enough for the House to vote to impeach the President, which they did. 

They subpoenaed several people to come in as a witness during the House hearing. Every subpoena was ignored. Imagine not showing up for Jury Duty. A cop is at your house with an arrest warrant that very same day. 

[tdawg87]

4 minutes ago, Blarg said:

Nope. He is constitutionally correct. 

So you agree with what he said? And I assume if that happened during the Clinton impeachment, you wouldn't have been bitching about it? Nor would any of your conservative relatives or friends?

[Lou]

2 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

Right, and those witnesses were enough for the House to vote to impeach the President, which they did. 

They subpoenaed several people to come in as a witness during the House hearing. Every subpoena was ignored. Imagine not showing up for Jury Duty. A cop is at your house with an arrest warrant that very same day. 

No, they're not. 

[Lou]

8 minutes ago, sht1ckboy said:

Would you like to see videos of Lindsey Graham, and McConnell from that same trial?

Yes 

[St1ck]

1 minute ago, Lou said:

No, they're not. 

Ok, in your case it would be ICE.

[St1ck]

Just now, Lou said:

Yes 

Give me a minute c*nt.

[tdawg87]

2 minutes ago, Lou said:

No, they're not. 

[St1ck]

Resurfaced Video Shows Lindsey Graham Arguing for Witnesses to Testify at Bill Clinton Impeachment Trial
https://www.newsweek.com/lindsey-graham-resurfaced-video-witnesses-clinton-trump-impeachment-1480835

[St1ck]

Resurfaced Video Shows Mitch McConnell Supporting Witnesses In Bill Clinton Impeachment Trial: 'I Voted For Live Witnesses Myself'
https://www.newsweek.com/resurfaced-video-shows-mitch-mcconnell-supporting-witnesses-bill-clinton-impeachment-trial-i-1483335