Jump to content
  • Welcome to AngelsWin.com

    AngelsWin.com - THE Internet Home for Angels fans! Unraveling Angels Baseball ... One Thread at a Time.

    Register today to comment and join the most interactive online Angels community on the net!

    Once you're a member you'll see less advertisements. If you become a Premium member and you won't see any ads! 

     

IGNORED

So... Marcell Ozuna


Chuck

Recommended Posts

I really wanted to trade for this guy in the offseason, but now his price tag has gone significantly up. 

.322/.374/567 with 15 HR and 43 RBI.

That said... Do we have anything left to trade for this guy? I cannot even think of anything close, unless Richards was healthy. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chuckster70 said:

I really wanted to trade for this guy in the offseason, but now his price tag has gone significantly up. 

.322/.374//567 with 15 HR and 43 RBI.

That said... Do we have anything left to trade for this guy? I cannot even think of anything close, unless Richards was healthy. 

 

 

If he's not off the market, he should be!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, hangin n wangin said:

Guy is a beast. We have no one.

Our best chance was going into the season. We could have traded them Santiago and Skaggs, or a combination of one of the two and something else. He was coming off a poor showing last season, outside of some HR's. 

FAIL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Chuckster70 said:

I really wanted to trade for this guy in the offseason, but now his price tag has gone significantly up. 

.322/.374/567 with 15 HR and 43 RBI.

That said... Do we have anything left to trade for this guy? I cannot even think of anything close, unless Richards was healthy. 

 

 

I did too, but unfortunately, I doubt we have anything to offer a team that is playing well, is in a pennant race, and would be trading one of its best assets.

It's not like we're the Red Sox, Dodgers, or Cubs, with tradeable assets up the ass...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there was definitely a consensus opinion that he was a good target for buy low, but the marlins weren't really down on him, as they pretended. they sent him down to control his FA clock, it was an underhanded move, but prototypical of the marlins ownership.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, ukyah said:

there was definitely a consensus opinion that he was a good target for buy low, but the marlins weren't really down on him, as they pretended. they sent him down to control his FA clock, it was an underhanded move, but prototypical of the marlins ownership.

Marlins ownership being underhanded?

You don't say...

How much money did they dupe the residents of Dade County to pay up for that pinball machine they play in?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...