Israel vs. Palestine

[Amazing Larry]

 

[gotbeer]

Haha.  Political and not hate speech. 

[cals]

I’m not sure why you gentiles and Buddhists give a fuck.

[Blarg]

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67198270

 

[Amazing Larry]

I think once the ground offensive begins the conflict is going to spread to Lebanon and beyond. 

 

[Spirit]

1 hour ago, Lhalo said:

I think once the ground offensive begins the conflict is going to spread to Lebanon and beyond. 

 

 

 

 

[cals]

1 hour ago, Lhalo said:

I think once the ground offensive begins the conflict is going to spread to Lebanon and beyond. 

 

Most of those 600,000 Americans don’t actually need help getting out of Israel but they’re not going to pass up a free flight.

[Blarg]

18 minutes ago, cals said:

Most of those 600,000 Americans don’t actually need help getting out of Israel but they’re not going to pass up a free flight.

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit. 

[cals]

33 minutes ago, Blarg said:

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit. 

Humor isn’t yours.

[Kevin]

1 hour ago, Spirit said:

 

 

 

Why is Biden's hand going through the book in the first picture? Boy I hope someone got fired for that blunder. 

[Spirit]

12 minutes ago, Kevin said:

Why is Biden's hand going through the book in the first picture? Boy I hope someone got fired for that blunder. 

 

It's a built in finger handle for the old man.  It lowers his chance of dropping it. 

(Patent pending)

 

[Blarg]

Yesterday's headlines walked back on the back pages of the NYT editorial section. They, and other media outlets, fucked up. It's what happens when you let the terrorists control the narrative.

Editors’ Note: Gaza Hospital Coverage - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

...However, the early versions of the coverage — and the prominence it received in a headline, news alert and social media channels — relied too heavily on claims by Hamas, and did not make clear that those claims could not immediately be verified. The report left readers with an incorrect impression about what was known and how credible the account was.

Given the sensitive nature of the news during a widening conflict, and the prominent promotion it received, Times editors should have taken more care with the initial presentation, and been more explicit about what information could be verified. 

 

[Amazing Larry]

29 minutes ago, Blarg said:

Yesterday's headlines walked back on the back pages of the NYT editorial section. They, and other media outlets, fucked up. It's what happens when you let the terrorists control the narrative.

Editors’ Note: Gaza Hospital Coverage - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

...However, the early versions of the coverage — and the prominence it received in a headline, news alert and social media channels — relied too heavily on claims by Hamas, and did not make clear that those claims could not immediately be verified. The report left readers with an incorrect impression about what was known and how credible the account was.

Given the sensitive nature of the news during a widening conflict, and the prominent promotion it received, Times editors should have taken more care with the initial presentation, and been more explicit about what information could be verified. 

 

That Nothing guy’s heart is broken. 

[Jason]

1 hour ago, Blarg said:

Yesterday's headlines walked back on the back pages of the NYT editorial section. They, and other media outlets, fucked up. It's what happens when you let the terrorists control the narrative.

Editors’ Note: Gaza Hospital Coverage - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

...However, the early versions of the coverage — and the prominence it received in a headline, news alert and social media channels — relied too heavily on claims by Hamas, and did not make clear that those claims could not immediately be verified. The report left readers with an incorrect impression about what was known and how credible the account was.

Given the sensitive nature of the news during a widening conflict, and the prominent promotion it received, Times editors should have taken more care with the initial presentation, and been more explicit about what information could be verified. 

 

This is what happens when you hear unverified news that you really hope is true. We all would have the same excitement if some random sports reporter put out a story about Arte selling the team again. 

[Make Angels Great Again]

@Taylor still stands with Hamas tho. I’m sure it was Israel all along

[Taylor]

11 minutes ago, Make Angels Great Again said:

@Taylor still stands with Hamas tho. I’m sure it was Israel all along

It's cute that you and Blarq now trust the "failing" New York Times.

[Jason]

Just now, Taylor said:

It's cute that you and Blarq now trust the "failing" New York Times.

Nobody needs an NYT article to know that the original report put out by Hamas was BS. 

[Taylor]

1 minute ago, Jason said:

Nobody needs an NYT article to know that the original report put out by Hamas was BS. 

I guess I'll take your word for it.

[AngelsLongBall]

4 hours ago, cals said:

Most of those 600,000 Americans don’t actually need help getting out of Israel but they’re not going to pass up a free flight.

[Make Angels Great Again]

3 hours ago, Taylor said:

It's cute that you and Blarq now trust the "failing" New York Times.

[Make Angels Great Again]

This one is also hilarious.

[tdawg87]

[Taylor]

44 minutes ago, Make Angels Great Again said:

This one is also hilarious.

@cysomeawfulpitcher?

[Make Angels Great Again]

1 minute ago, Taylor said:

@cysomeawfulpitcher?

 

That's the most insulting reply I've ever gotten on this board.

[Make Angels Great Again]

@Taylor, i'm hurt.