Johnny Cueto?

[notherhalo]

yes yes yes

[Mark68]

I would not be opposed, depending on the years (for a 36-year-old pitcher). 

He'll be 37 by the time the season begins.

 

[mmc]

This thread sucks

[Blarg]

Please walk away from this idea. 

[Angels 1961]

Lorenzen is a big NO

[BTH]

27 minutes ago, notherhalo said:

yes yes yes

no no no

[tdawg87]

[Chuck]

I’m for it only if it’s a 1-year deal and doesn’t cost us much. 

I’ve said it many times. I want Major League veteran depth on this team, not counting on Canning/C-Rod or one of our prospect pitchers as our 6th starter. 
 

 

[Angels 1961]

Guys like Cueto can be traded at deadline. I also feel players like Cueto, Lorenzen, Andrus among many others will go after winter meetings.

[Dtwncbad]

On a one-year deal where you pay him at a 4.75 era price hoping for 4.00, maybe.

Otherwise, pass.

[OhtaniSan]

I would be happy with Cueto as our 6th man. He falls into the same category as Lorenzen in that regard. 

I like Lorenzen more between the two though, as Lorenzen has been and could be a solid reliever as a fallback role. Plus Lorenzen has said he really wants to stay local in Anaheim, and he's jacked. 

Both guys would be cheap 1 year signings and relatively low risk (anything more than 1year isn't worth paying for).

[Taylor]

howaboutnobear.jpg

[Angel Oracle]

Rather keep Lorenzen.