Kevin

6 minutes ago, UndertheHalo said:

This is an unfortunate take sir.  Urgently needs to be reconsidered.  

Hitler vs Stalin. Teamed up on Poland. Russia hoping to join the Axis but got stood up by Hitler. Both responsible for for tens of millions of deaths. Meh.

2 hours ago, Spirit said:

Canada:  "Woohoo!  He fought against Russia!"

 

 

It’s not like the internet has been around for a month or two. I think someone could have researched this a bit better and said “nah let’s skip this.”

Although to be fair, in the eastern theater, it really was just bad guys killing bad guys. At least on the battlefield itself.

11 hours ago, St1ck said:

So according to your words you watched a few clips and then just put it out of your mind. If that's the case how can you claim the "fake left MSM blew it hugely out of proportion?" How can you make the claim that the FBI instigated it if you just watched bits?

I already know the answer is because you are full of shit and talking out of your ass but would still would like to hear it from you.

I was puzzled too by this. Was he claiming that Trump didn’t rile up some of his most die hard supporters before and after the election prior to January 6th? That MSNBC blew what he was saying and doing out of proportion? I know AJ leans more left but isn’t happy with the current Democrat party which is perfectly normal but it still seems like an odd take.

Are you guys meeting up at the Four Seasons Hotel or Four Seasons Total Landscaping?

Inquiring minds would like to know.

Can we cut off aid to Israel as well as Ukraine? Might as well shut off the nozzle there too.

Too much negativity guys. Let’s lighten up a bit.

1 minute ago, Kotchman said:

I don’t disagree with that. Although I have met quite a few good Mormon people but we’ve never discussed that sect of their religion 

Mormons are great people. Active die hard members are just ignorant of their church history mainly because leadership has tried to whitewash it and hide it from them. They are coming clean a little bit better these days, mainly because it’s harder to hide stuff.

Look’s like Ballard left OUR in July for reasons unknown at the time. Again, I’m assuming the truth, whatever that might be, will eventually come out.

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/sound-of-freedom-tim-ballard-leaves-operation-underground-railroad-1234787753/amp/

26 minutes ago, Kotchman said:

And nothing to do with a potential challenge to Mitt Romney. That said multiple sexual partners isn’t all that deviant for many Mormons to begin with. 

Just to clarify, Mitt isn’t running so he’s not challenging him.

Ironically, early Mormon history was all about church leaders trafficking young girls and married women under the guise of marriage. Tim Ballard is wants to fight that but as an active member of his church, neither read up on his church’s history or ignored it.

5 minutes ago, Kotchman said:

You obviously have no clue how sting operations work. These guys don’t go in with an FBI hat. They absolutely have to get real close to the action to gain traction. 

I have no idea if the allegations are true or not. But Ballard did step down from OUR earlier this year after internal investigations within OUR were being conducted based off the accusations by multiple employees. This is before the VICE article came out, if I remember correctly.

There's a cover story one needs to sell and then there's going too far, especially in private where you don't need to sell an image. Again, it might all be bullshit but there's a lot of charlatan behavior, especially in the state of Utah and within the LDS church. It wouldn't shock me if this was true. I guess we'll see what comes of it. 

9 minutes ago, ten ocho recon scout said:

So out of curiosity, when that happens, do teams just photoshop their face in afterwards?

2 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

Isn't this a myth? The whole "if I ever run for president I'll run as a Republican because they're stupid" thing was never said, at least publicly.

Maybe it's true. But I don't think Trump is smart enough for something like that. 

I don’t think he ever said said but maybe I’m wrong.

Trump is just an opportunist and plays the con game. He’s done it long enough and knows how to do it to perfection. In this particular case, politics and the Republican Party were ripe for his game.

Very inappropriate.

She went on a date with a Democrat? Pretty immoral.

9 hours ago, Kotchman said:

https://nypost.com/2023/09/15/lauren-boebert-groped-beetlejuice-date-in-heavy-petting-session-before-getting-tossed-out/amp/
 

 

I’m kind of disappointed that this wasn’t a play on Schindler’s List instead of Beetlejuice. With all the making out and groping, it just seems like a better taste.

Oh and replace the pregnant woman complaining with MTG, and it would have been perfection.

4 minutes ago, UndertheHalo said:

I know you’re not doing this but just for everyone else.  Let’s not weep too much for Mitt.  This guy is a sainted resistance warrior now.  Not that he needs it, but he’s achieved what the real objective is for all these people.  He’s going to go on tv and get paid.  He’s gonna sit on boards and not do jack shit and get paid, he going to talk at think tanks or sit on think tank boards and get paid.  It’s beautiful.  He doesn’t have to pretend to give a shit about anything anymore.  And as one of the most truly insulated from anything human beings that has ever lived why should he?  God bless him.  

No argument there from me. Whatever his true motives are though, genuine or not, he limited himself to just one term. I'll give him at least a "tip of the cap." That's about it from me. 

I actually had no problem with what the Dems did to Bernie. After all, he as an independent was using the DNC as a way to get to the White House. Their party, their rules. What I do have a problem with is Bernie had to go through the DNC if he was to have a legitimate shot at getting the nomination. He really had no choice but to use them. 

As of right now, there are only two roads to take. Sad.

1 hour ago, Jay said:

Term limits would solve a lot of problems.

The problem is the ones that would make that law aren't going to give up their power by limiting themselves to it. If the American public wants term limits, they are going to have to rely on themselves to enforce them. Which means possibly voting for the other side of their own political spectrum. And because of that, I just don't see term limits in the near future. I could be wrong.

Whatever one may think of Mitt Romney, he at least decided to call it quits after one term. His fellow colleague, Mike Lee, said he would only run for two terms in 2010. He just began the start of his third term earlier this year. And the ones that voted for him either conveniently forgot they wanted term limits for politicians or really don't care as long as their guy won. 

Biden should just stick to stories like his participation in the Battle of Lundy Lane during the War of 1812. That one is actually believable.

20 hours ago, Jason said:

In his defense, he is probably guessing about things in his past at this point. 

I looked it up, apparently he visited nine days after the attack. Meh. Anyways, he should just retire. But our government has become a nursing home these days. 

20 minutes ago, AngelFanInTheATL said:

Imagine saying "Curt Schilling got it right" about anything.  This guy said the Parkland shooting was fake, said 9/11 was an inside job and is a total Qanon guy. 

Curt Schilling can be right in one area and wrong in others. That's life. 

3 hours ago, Redondo said:

Definitely needs to be term limits

These senile people have no business running the country

We do have term limits. People just choose not to enforce them every election cycle because the right and left can’t stomach voting for someone that has the wrong letter next to their name. They’ll just vote for the person they complain about for the next two to six years.

1 hour ago, Taylor said:

Remember the "Rangers Team Cruise" thread?

I could be wrong but I believe that was the Red Sox team cruise thread after their 2011 collapse.

Damn I wish we had all the HOF threads from the old board. 

56 minutes ago, St1ck said:

Huckabee: 2024 will be last election ‘decided by ballots rather than bullets’ if Trump loses over legal cases | The Hill

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4190468-huckabee-2024-will-be-last-election-decided-by-ballots-rather-than-bullets-if-trump-loses-over-legal-cases/

I’m sure Mike will be on the frontlines fighting like the brave soldier politician he is.

23 hours ago, W.E. Baxter Author said:

Joe Biden is going to be impeached. Also, NO ONE is more well versed on the First Amendment and the Presidential Records Act than the Attorney General of the United States (Merrick Garland. Yet he has WILLFULLY denied Donald Trump's Rights under the Freedom of Speech Amendment and the Presidential Records A ct(And he knows he  is doing that) and has been trying to to flake Donald Trump on phony indictments and charges hoping that Donald Trump will be (unjustly) sent off to die in prison. Merrick Garland needs to be impeached as well. In fact, Margery Taylor Greene filed articles of impeachment against Matthew Graves, Christopher Wray, and Alejandro Mayorkas in addition to Merrick Garland and Joe Biden. Rep. Andy Ogles filed an Article of Impeachment against Kamala Harris for her treason down at the border. Biden definitely needs to be impeached, but the other 5 Articles need to be carried out first.

Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.