ukyah

farts. that's what i think of the majority of expert evaluations on this board. thank you for your time.

i'll just skip the rest and say that i think trumbo is very good.

not trying to be a vocabulary nazi, but you're looking for systemic.

man could this guy be more right? just look at all the proof.

man could this guy be more right? just look at all the proof.

my only comment is, 43th?

sure, let's ignore the fact that he's been pitching lights out all year and pretend it's just the angels sucking. although the angels do suck this year, but that's not the point!!!

sure, let's ignore the fact that he's been pitching lights out all year and pretend it's just the angels sucking. although the angels do suck this year, but that's not the point!!!

we are all dumber for having read that. 

fail x3

you guys are so beyond ****ed now with your opinions that i can't even tell anymore whether your opinion is being stated in jest or not.

he's an amazing player and if i was at the game i'd give him a standing ovation in celebration of a stand up guy and one of the greatest pitchers ever.

wow, those are bad.

i friggin hate texas and it's religious right, but that's just me.

i'll put in my .02 without reading the thread. i couldn't give a shit about which song is played in the 7th inning stretch. they want to play buttercup? fine, it's a fun song. now focus on winning some ****ing games.

i, also, don't appreciate the "juicing" comment. we've been testing for quite a while now and tons of huge names have been sullied and some destroyed. logic dictates that if pujols was an habitual user, then he too would have been named. to my knowledge, his name has never even been linked. if that's true, then any insinuations are just cheap, ignorant and irresponsible.

i, also, don't appreciate the "juicing" comment. we've been testing for quite a while now and tons of huge names have been sullied and some destroyed. logic dictates that if pujols was an habitual user, then he too would have been named. to my knowledge, his name has never even been linked. if that's true, then any insinuations are just cheap, ignorant and irresponsible.

i, also, don't appreciate the "juicing" comment. we've been testing for quite a while now and tons of huge names have been sullied and some destroyed. logic dictates that if pujols was an habitual user, then he too would have been named. to my knowledge, his name has never even been linked. if that's true, then any insinuations are just cheap, ignorant and irresponsible.

so many bitch ass angel fans. if you could eat em, i'd be stuffed.

it's too bad that this team tanked so badly, that when they get healthy and start pitching and hitting, it will already be too late to matter. other than to cost them a high draft pick. 
 
#harsh reality   <--------doing this makes me feel youthful and culturally hip.

why does he have to have had no clue? why can't it be that he did have a clue, but the angels are just running bad now. they can't  do anything right it seems. haven't you ever been in a rut before? sometimes, it takes time to get out of it. doesn't mean you should be happy about it, but see it for what it is, rather than gross incompetence. i do feel that scioscia and coaches should go, but that's my opinion, for other reasons than that "he sucks".
 
they brought greinke in for a playoff push, they made him a huge contract offer, but the dodgers went haywire and made him the highest paid rh pitcher in the game. should he have signed him to that contract? that would have been as big a mistake as any other huge FA signing.
 
things just aren't going the angels way recently, it's called paying the piper and it's because of the previous regime and the lasting effects of it. should they have kept all of their prospects and gone for a rebuild two years ago? totally valid question. 
 
everything else is just sour milk.

bashing dipoto and scioscia is totally warrented for the sake of criticism, even arte...as a decision maker.
 
however, the whole "angry arte" thing is so thin. he's just conjuring that out of nothing and expecting it to stick.
 
for me, it's like a litmus test for the stupid. anybody that thinks arte is just some angry tyrant is unabashedly stupid, no sugar coating that.

why does everyone think that maddon would just jump at the chance to manage the angels? he's already a manager, he's already in the AL east and his team has brighter prospects legitimately than the angels.

lol is such a great response to a well made point. 

i tried and failed to multiquote, but the moral of the story is this: i have no such "rose colored view" of the angels this year. i believe they are still paying the price for the reagins era and have picked them to miss the playoffs this year, which would make them a massive disappointment to many people around the country.
 
i don't even particularly disagree with the OP, as he stated a case with some possible merit.
 
i did say, however, that this place turns into a bunch of nancy boys who want their cake when the regular season starts. any objective person could look at the first page of this forum and see i'm right.
 
if you guys want to pout, knock your socks off, i don't post that much during the regular season because of it, but you can expect me to tell you that you're a sissy. you've either got the moxie for the long haul or you don't.
 
in any case, like what i think or say matters to you guys anyway. i know that and so do you.