Jump to content

Dtwncbad

Premium Membership
  • Posts

    9,790
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by Dtwncbad

  1. 5 minutes ago, Taylor said:

    n fact, next time a woman legitimately accuses a professional sports player of sexual assault, a bunch of people will look to this situation and assume she's crazy and lying. 

    No Taylor.  Only stupid people will assume that.  And only stupid people will automatically take every accusation as truthful.

    People with brains will be acutely interested in finding the actual truth in every individual case, wherever that leads them, including ultimately considering the accused as the victim.

  2. 7 minutes ago, Taylor said:

    You mean, like the #metoo movement? That's exactly what it was about.

    OMG you can’t help yourself.  Dude, literally nobody on earth ever had any problem with anyone legitimately coming forward to talk about their honest history especially in the context of sticking up for individual rights and making progress as a society.

    But with that comes a responsibility for everyone to watch out for opportunists that would hijack it dishonestly and for their own fraudulent agendas.

    People with a stitch of common sense will instant reject “believe all women” and will EQUALLY stick up for victims of liars and extortionists.

    #metoobutwithabrain

  3. What decade was baseball best for you as a fan?  I am not asking when it was best as an Angel fan.  I am asking when you thought baseball itself was the most fun to follow.

    My answer is the 1980s.  When I watch clips of baseball from the 80’s it brings me back to what I now consider the height of my love of following the game.

    I am aware that this could be age related.  I was in my late teens and early twenties at that time.  I was old enough to know enough about the game and players to really enjoy the game analytically, and still young enough to be a little naively enamored with it emotionally.

    The algorithm on Instagram has somehow figured this out and is feeding me lots of clips from that era.   It has made me realize that there was something different about my relationship with mlb overall during that time, and I wondered if others feel the same way about that time. . . Or if THEIR best decade with the game maybe corresponds with THEIR age?

  4. It should at least be mentioned that teams not wanting to deal with the negative PR of signing Bauer does prevent him from getting a big contract he would normally get, and that only helps to encourage others in the future to fraudulently extort players.

    MLB is gonna do what it’s gonna do.  But I hope somebody is at least taking this into consideration and is hopefully working with the union to try to get some processes in place to protect players from being fraudulently extorted.

  5. 35 minutes ago, Chitown27Fan said:

    Funny how everyone in baseball that ranks prospects and farm systems always say the Angels system is a desert and they suck. Yet so many times we cut someone there is teams there swooping in to grab them up and add them to thier system. Funny to me how that works. 

    Wouldn’t this be evidence that the Angels system of development is more the problem than the actual level of raw talent?

  6. 2 minutes ago, Erstad Grit said:

    If you're talking an emergency extra inning game, sure, I think Ward is our extreme depth at catcher as well.

    I'm talking about if Nolan HAS to go down to AAA and 1B needs an extended replacement. Drury seems to be that guy. For me that's not very deep.

    I don't see how Ward and Rendon can be considered viable options for 1B. I agree with the sentiment, in the Rendon interview thread I stated I wish Rendon would have worked on 1B during the off-season for the reasons you're stating.

    It's another reason why I think Bellinger would be a good fit. He'd be in CF but offer up depth at 1B which I'm claiming we're lacking. 

    I'm assuming that Perry was looking at Votto for this reason. 

    We don’t disagree on much then.  There is nothing wrong with Drury at first.  He’s fine.  In the context of Bellinger, yeah he “fits” as a body for first base in addition to his ability to play OF.  He would then slot in front of Drury at 1B.

    My point was more that the Angels do have “enough” depth at first.  Yes, the playability of that depth decreases as you get to the third and fourth guy, naturally.  I mean, if the Angels were forces to play Ward at 1B for 100+ games it means they had at least three other problems at the position.  You realistically cannot build a roster where your fourth option at a position isn’t a significant drop off from the normal starter, right?

    But even though Bellinger isn’t my favorite player, he does fit this Angel roster pretty well, including freeing up somebody like Ward to be moved for pitching.  So I don’t want the Angels to hand out a bad contract, but Bellinger is tempting if the price becomes reasonable.

  7. 13 minutes ago, Erstad Grit said:

    My guess is we are not going to agree.  But are you telling me that Rendon, who has traditionally been an excellent defender at third base, isn’t capable of playing first base at least adequately?  I mean, it seems like Rendon’s biggest problem defensively has become throwing accuracy, where at first base that would be masked.

    Ward is a little tougher to project being good enough, but normally a guy that can play three OF positions, has already played some third, and is a former catcher PROBABLY can handle first base, don’t you think?

    Plus we are talking about Ward being the fourth person on the depth chart.  Personally I don’t have the expectation that the fourth person in the depth chart at the position be anything more than a stopgap fill in temporarily.

×
×
  • Create New...