sports fans are weird. they watch the game daily, but gather so little information from it. it'd be like a person following chess, but never learning the nuances of the game. there is 200 years of recorded history in baseball of slumps varying in size from a single game to an entire season. iannetta and joyce are good players, they had pronounced slumps, at some point the skills will erode and it's the FO job to be able to determine a slump from erosion. the idea that a player is only as good as his current results is shortsighted and, frankly, elementary. i like this site when it elevates the conversation and loathe it when it lowers it. that may just be the way it is, but i don't have to like it.