Jump to content

Angels in 2030

Members
  • Posts

    1,050
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    Angels in 2030 got a reaction from AngelsLakersFan in OC Register: Andrelton Simmons opens up about depression and thoughts of suicide   
    Someone's trying to get laid.  Wrong message board for that lol.
  2. Shwing!!
    Angels in 2030 got a reaction from Taylor in OC Register: Andrelton Simmons opens up about depression and thoughts of suicide   
    Someone's trying to get laid.  Wrong message board for that lol.
  3. Like
    Angels in 2030 got a reaction from ten ocho recon scout in OC Register: Andrelton Simmons opens up about depression and thoughts of suicide   
    Someone's trying to get laid.  Wrong message board for that lol.
  4. Haha
    Angels in 2030 reacted to Angelsjunky in OC Register: Andrelton Simmons opens up about depression and thoughts of suicide   
    Of course what really works is using words like "WAR" and "BABIP" and, better yet, "wRC+." The chicks really dig that sort of thing.
  5. THIS!
    Angels in 2030 reacted to tdawg87 in OC Register: Andrelton Simmons opens up about depression and thoughts of suicide   
    Rule #1: Be attractive.
    Rule #2: See rule number 1.
  6. Like
    Angels in 2030 reacted to ten ocho recon scout in THE THING   
    My first thought was kelvim escobar
  7. Like
    Angels in 2030 reacted to Chuck in Gameday Thread: Angels vs. Royals (4-12-2021)   
    Cobb is just NASTY!
    Thank you Perry! 
  8. Like
    Angels in 2030 got a reaction from Inside Pitch in Gameday Thread: Angels vs. Royals (4-12-2021)   
    Instacart 
  9. Like
    Angels in 2030 reacted to bloodbrother in Gameday Thread: Angels vs. Royals (4-12-2021)   
    Angels pitching problems solved by simply trading for Orioles pitchers. Who knew
  10. Like
    Angels in 2030 reacted to Inside Pitch in Gameday Thread: Angels vs. Royals (4-12-2021)   
    Dear CRod, Detmers, and Canning,
    Please visit Driveline this winter.  You'll like it.
    Love,
    Angels fans
  11. Haha
    Angels in 2030 reacted to Docwaukee in Angels sign Jose Quintana (1 year, $8 million)   
    check your bookmarks.  
  12. Like
    Angels in 2030 reacted to Inside Pitch in Why the Angels need Heyward more than any other team   
    I would have been ok with it up to a certain point.  I think I was being flippant because I didn't believe the team was going to sign anyone.  That said I'm the biggest run prevention whore on AW.com..  Also...  Im surprised his speed has fallen off the way it has.  
    Heyward will go down as a JD Drew, Darren Dreifort signing... Someone who ended up being over paid because people believed he would become better than he was at the time he signed.
  13. Like
    Angels in 2030 got a reaction from Inside Pitch in Why the Angels need Heyward more than any other team   
    lol....ok, that's odd & weird (in a good way) finding something that far back.  Well done.  You likely were correct in that i was thinking of a different poster or maybe a different FA when referencing you with Heyward.  although, to be fair, it does sound like you are saying you would want Heyward at that time for a contract less than 10 years (5-7+) and even willing to pay extra per year for a shorter time.  
    My main point was not meant to hit at you at all.  Your original response in that thread got me thinking about the annoyance of some who feel they are always right and using analytics to support it.  As if baseball can give you anything that's a probable outcome...let alone 75-100% of the time (some posters think they are right 100% of the time).  Baseball by it's nature is unknown and uncertain.  Whether that be the greatest hitters of all time (being out way more often than not) or the best GM.  That's what makes baseball so great.  Who'd have expected the 1988 LADs ragtags winning it all against a few of the best teams (even w/out Gibson).  So how can randoms on a fan board be so right all the time.  GMs get paid millions and they are wrong all the time.  Just admit you are wrong...it's ok (not YOU Inside pitch....i'm speaking in general).  Ironically, you are one of the few who i put value in from a player evaluation comment perspective.  I was just using your comment to bounce off of.  
  14. It's True!
    Angels in 2030 reacted to Erstad Grit in Angels sign Jose Quintana (1 year, $8 million)   
    Settle down there. Are you just bitter you were wrong about Teheran? I'm pretty tired of the cycle here.
    Angels sign a player
    Some here complain that it's a bad move
    The "smart" posters arrogantly tell us how little we know about baseball and how this move is great.  
    Player sucks, smart posters shrug
    Repeat 
  15. Like
    Angels in 2030 reacted to Second Base in Angels sign Jose Quintana (1 year, $8 million)   
    Subpar in comparison to the Padres, who grabbed the exact three starters I was hoping the Angels would. Neither Cobb, nor Quintana will be as good as Darvish, Snell or Musgrove. 
    So that hasn't changed at all.
    And neither has my view of Canning, who I believed would be the Angels 4th best starter, despite his inconsistencies.
    After my initial unfavorable reaction to the Cobb trade (which mainly my disappointment in not getting a TOR starter, AND giving up Jam Jones) I acknowledged the likelihood in my mind that he would bounce back away from Baltimore and post 160+ innings with an ERA under 4.00. 
    Quintana and Heaney are going to be fighting off replacement by Detmers later in the season. 
    So no change. 
  16. Like
    Angels in 2030 reacted to Ray McKigney in Gameday Thread: Angels vs. Blue Jays (4-10-2021)   
    Fuckin' Quintana, man
  17. Thank You
  18. Like
    Angels in 2030 reacted to Stradling in Gameday Thread: Angels vs. Blue Jays (4-10-2021)   
    They really need to get the announcers at the ballpark.  
  19. THIS!
    Angels in 2030 reacted to beatlesrule in Gameday Thread: Angels vs. Blue Jays (4-10-2021)   
    Even if that would have gone in the Angels favor, it still took way way way too long. Most of these replays do. Something really needs to be done about it.
  20. Like
  21. Like
    Angels in 2030 reacted to Slegnaac in Gameday Thread: Angels vs. Blue Jays (4-10-2021)   
    Just pull the team off the field.
    Nothing good is going to happen tonight.
  22. Like
    Angels in 2030 reacted to bloodbrother in Gameday Thread: Angels vs. Blue Jays (4-10-2021)   
    This should be a pretty easy overturn but you know....Umpires suck
  23. Like
    Angels in 2030 got a reaction from DMVol in Gameday Thread: Angels vs. Blue Jays (4-10-2021)   
    If this game Rained out, does it still count as a Pujols game and we get Walsh back in?
  24. Like
    Angels in 2030 got a reaction from ten ocho recon scout in Gameday Thread: Angels vs. Blue Jays (4-10-2021)   
    If this game Rained out, does it still count as a Pujols game and we get Walsh back in?
  25. Like
    Angels in 2030 got a reaction from oldguy in Gameday Thread: Angels vs. Blue Jays (4-10-2021)   
    If this game Rained out, does it still count as a Pujols game and we get Walsh back in?
×
×
  • Create New...