Angels in 2030

They did:
 

I mean, can we officially stop using polls now? 

It lacks context so yea it’s ignorant. 

I'd be more concerned with they had 1-2 guys only looked at.  Clearly they need new ideas and to figure things out.  So casting a wide net and seeing what pieces could fit, best ideas for building organization, etc. is a positive one it seems.  

I'd be more concerned with they had 1-2 guys only looked at.  Clearly they need new ideas and to figure things out.  So casting a wide net and seeing what pieces could fit, best ideas for building organization, etc. is a positive one it seems.  

I'd be more concerned with they had 1-2 guys only looked at.  Clearly they need new ideas and to figure things out.  So casting a wide net and seeing what pieces could fit, best ideas for building organization, etc. is a positive one it seems.  

Wong will be much cheaper than Semien.  And Semien has ONE season where OPS exceeded .735.

$14M to Semien for 2021 would be a huge waste of resources.
I also think this is going to be one year where the FA actual contracts look way less than predicted -- versus the other way around annually.  One word: Co-lose-young.

I wish they did go cheap that draft -- Yelich and Syndergaard sitting right there for them to take and pay them way less.  Imagine the fortunes of this franchise if they selected those two instead?  Both went right after / near their picks.  Others down the line like Simmons, Realmito, etc.  But Yelich & Noah we're absolutely realistic picks.   

I wish they did go cheap that draft -- Yelich and Syndergaard sitting right there for them to take and pay them way less.  Imagine the fortunes of this franchise if they selected those two instead?  Both went right after / near their picks.  Others down the line like Simmons, Realmito, etc.  But Yelich & Noah we're absolutely realistic picks.   

The Angels seem to be doing their due diligence.  
Bane certainly lacks the credentials of most of the other candidates but I am sure they've got their reasons for contacting him.  
I could actually see them bringing him back in the scouting and development department as some sort of VP and assistant GM.  
Not sure he'd be at the top of my list but it would certainly be fun to have him back in some way.  

Good lord...so many things wrong about this.  On the plus side, it'll make whomever we hire as our GM not seem so bad.

There is nothing to lose from claiming  Hand.  At worst he flops, but he's only on the team for one year. At best he is a lockdown closer, and depending on where we are, we can trade him or keep him. 

I want no part of JP..  NONE....  

It's a moot-point now since they won game 6, but it would be really interesting what today would be for game 7 had the Rays came back to win that game.  How many LADs have either been infected by Turner (before/during game 6) and/or need to sit out quarantining under the MLB CV rules. That would have been funny to see how MLB and Manfred would handle that debacle. 
 

So why didn't you just say, "you're really old" instead of some cryptic bullshit about Trout being a meme on reddit.

It's a moot-point now since they won game 6, but it would be really interesting what today would be for game 7 had the Rays came back to win that game.  How many LADs have either been infected by Turner (before/during game 6) and/or need to sit out quarantining under the MLB CV rules. That would have been funny to see how MLB and Manfred would handle that debacle. 
 

You guys are so stupid, and bitter, and dumb.  Its like this board is filled with children.  Completely incapable of just admitting the better team won.

honestly, it sounds a bit whiney and reeks of jealousy those trying to put down whomever wins this title.  If it were the Angels, the fanbases would be totally on the other side railing against those diminishing the title.  I honestly don't care.  They have earned it and are the example everyone wants to be.  They are not winning it via buying a title or anything.  Anyway, hats off to them if they win.  I personally care more about the Angels getting their house in order and becoming a contender rather than living thru the defeats of others -- except the Bosux (hate them).  

reminds of that guy at the gym who used to bring his own barf bucket. 

Keep in mind the dude saying it isn’t an Angel fan.  He’s just a Trout fan, and he’s not very bright. 

The Rays had the best record in the league - by four games.
Why do you guys just make stuff up?

honestly, it sounds a bit whiney and reeks of jealousy those trying to put down whomever wins this title.  If it were the Angels, the fanbases would be totally on the other side railing against those diminishing the title.  I honestly don't care.  They have earned it and are the example everyone wants to be.  They are not winning it via buying a title or anything.  Anyway, hats off to them if they win.  I personally care more about the Angels getting their house in order and becoming a contender rather than living thru the defeats of others -- except the Bosux (hate them).  

This title is 100% legit. Pretty much everyone was picking the Dodgers to be in the World Series. For the American League, there were a lot of Yankees predictions but I did see some Rays in there too. It's not like the Marlins and white sox are in the World Series people. The two teams in the World Series are very good and were supposed to be this good.

The Rays are a .500 team at best over a full season