Jump to content

Hufflepuff

Members
  • Posts

    161
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Hufflepuff

  1. 17 hours ago, Inside Pitch said:

    Doc went into the differences in HRs vs Walk rate -- but otherwise they are so close it's not worth bothering with the differences..   

    Career as Angels

    Heaney - 330 IP, 8.6 H/9, 1.5 HR/9, 2.3 BB/9, 8.6 K/9, 4.23 ERA, 4.33 FIP
    Skaggs - 431 IP, 9.0 H/9, 1.1 HR/9, 3.0 BB/9, 8.4 K/9, 4.30 ERA, 3.90 FIP

    Seriously, if your entire argument is built on Heaney's swinging strike rate over 16 innings this season then you don't really have an argument at all.  Last year he came in at 11.9 to Skaggs' 11.1.  

    You know why he gets a longer leash?  Because the same Angels fans that couldn't get passed Howie Kendrick future batting champion, can't get beyond the expectations that were similarly foisted on Skaggs.  Angels fans have a tendency to base their view of players on what they wanted them to be or what they read in some write up .vs what they actually are.   Skaggs is Heaney, only with the added weight of greater expectations.

    Definitely not my entire argument, but if Heaney is getting that kind of swing and miss on two pitches... I think he can absolutely take his game to another level once he works his changeup in. I haven't been on the board long, so maybe you're right with people giving Heaney slack for the reasons you mention. I give Heaney slack because I think his potential is much greater than Skaggs. 

  2. 13 hours ago, Inside Pitch said:

    Heaney and Skaggs have been darn near statistical clones as Angels, Heaney just seems to get a longer leash from fans.  

     

    I'm not sure how you figure they're statistical clones. Heaney gets a "longer leash" because his advanced stats are significantly better. Heaney is essentially working off 2 pitches right now (fastball and slider), and rarely throwing his change up (which happened to be a great for him last year). Heaney's Swinging strike rate is at 19.4% which is absolutely amazing. He attacks the zone, has a low walk rate, and is way more efficient with his pitch count. Not only are their stats different, they're just different pitchers all together. Heaney is definitely the better pitcher.

    2020 Rotation: Ohtani, Heaney, Canning (potential ace level pitcher), Skaggs, and pick an arm amongst 6 available back end guys. 

    That's a very solid rotation. I think our pitching will be fine.

  3. 12 minutes ago, Second Base said:

    So we drafted a 2B, who is expected to be ready quickly. That's cool and everything except that we already have Fletcher, Rengifo and La Stella capable of playing 2B. And Rengifo and Fletcher are likely in the long term plans. Maybe even Jones.

    Seems like there were better picks on the board. Maybe I'm wrong. 

    I agree with your assessment. If we were drafting "best available" I think we let one go with Jackson Rutledge. I'm sure there's a lot more behind the scenes we don't know about, but I don't think we drafted a position of need or best available.

  4. 19 hours ago, Dochalo said:

    absolutely.  

    he was shifted on 73.0% of the time last year.  44.8% and 39.9% in he previous two years.  

    That would explain the decrease in BABIP. I wonder if an increase in his launch angle coupled with a continued hard hit % would be beneficial. Take advantage of that RF fence being lowered. Bottom line: I agree, ground balls into the shift are no bueno, and he needs to continue to just focus on that hard hit%

  5. I think this is a great opportunity to get a solid pitcher, plus fill another hole. If Goldschmidt is being packaged for an additional 1 year,  Jake lamb, or Robby Ray, than you gotta make this deal happen. 

    AZ gonna pay up to 10 mil a year according to USA Today’s Nightengale. I’d give up any of our prospects not named Jo Adell or Griffin Canning.

  6. I’m sure many have an opinion, but after watching Diaz close a game out last night, and Trienen have a 10 pitch shut out inning tonight... isn’t it kind of obvious? Sure we have holes, but don’t you think we would be 10 games over .500 if we had a lights out closer? 

    We have 22 saves on the season vs 42 (Sea) and 32 (Oak). We’ve blown 18 saves this season. A good bullpen/closer gets 13 of those 18. 

    This team isn’t as bad as some people think. They’re 2-3 good RP’s away from contending.

  7. Sucks to lose obviously, but I like where this team is going. I think Eppler has by far done more good than bad. He’s been extremely resourceful considering the salary bind he’s been in. He sees the big picture, and where he wants to steer the ship. He’s done a good job in the draft, which to me says a lot. He’s made great acquisitions with Ohtani and Maitan which nobody seems to give him credit for. The moves people feel are his “bad moves” have never hurt the team long term, and I felt we’re caluculated risks with upside. Many people on this board were so excited and praised the kinsler and cozart signings. They didn’t work out, so what. They very well could have had great seasons and suddenly he’s a genius again. Bottom line, the trade and signing didn’t hurt the team or effect his long term goal in my opinion. 

  8. 4 hours ago, The Boogie Man said:

    Last year we drafted Adell, he is now MLB.coms 13 ranked prospect in all of baseball.  He was drafted 10th.  We currently have 4 other guys, none of them drafted in the top ten, that are all in MLB.coms top 100.  So we have 5 of the top 100 prospects.  There is value to what Eppler is doing.  He is building a sustainable team, that when they have a need can call someone up instead of paying for it in free agency.  

    Now if we want to go way back and complain we didn’t trade Brandon Wood or Mathis or Adenhart or McPherson, that is fine we can complain about that, but honestly if we traded them, it is no way close to guaranteed those players would still be here.  Brandon Wood was 8 or 9 years ago.  We haven’t had a farm good enough or ranked high enough to help the major league team.  

    I have no idea what Marsh, Canning, Maitan, Adell, Suarez, Thiass, Fletcher, Ward, or any other guy will turn in to.  I just don’t know if trading them for relievers is the way to go.  Sure they may not pan out to be anything, but if we trade the wrong one for anything other than a long term player, I just think we are going the wrong way.  If it does work out, well then we can either create a team around Trout or we can survive his exit.  

    Agree 100%. Even if we get 4 Solid contributors out of that bunch, it’s worth holding onto them. We need to have a sustainable, affordable core group of guys to build around.

  9. 9 minutes ago, floplag said:

    I dont know what else to call the last couple years of dumpster diving other than just waiting till the bad money drops... which is another term ofr wasting 2 years when we should have the resources to absorb it.
    I simply cannot appreciate any reasons for wasting the last few years, and can think of no other word for it 

    That's why I'm asking, who could they have signed? Adding more big contracts on top of bad contracts because we have a young superstar doesn't fix the problem.  It makes it worst.

    They haven't just been waiting for big contracts to fall off the books, but have been desperately trying to rebuild a farm system that was by far the worst in all of baseball.

  10. I don't think they're trying to "rebuild" as you put it. Signing big free agent contracts, as you suggest, doesn't help this team. Who do you think we missed out on? Jason Heyward??? Zack Grienke??? No thank you. Trout is the best player in the game, and he's also very young. I think we're on the right track. Draft well, make smaller acquisitions that help the team like Maldonado, maybin, Meyer, and Escobar, and let the young talent come up and fill in around Trout. Hopefully we're contending in 3-4 years (Trout will still be south of 30). Its a process that you just gotta watch and try to enjoy. 

×
×
  • Create New...