Jump to content

Fish Oil

Premium Membership
  • Posts

    587
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Fish Oil

  1. 9 hours ago, wopphil said:

    Would anyone agree to take Darvish and 75 to 80 percent of his remaining contract if it came with Quintana and didnt require parting with Adell or Marsh? 

    Before planning the idea, Darvish was very good this year and mostly healthy, and Quintana's FIP was almost a run better than his ERA. 

    Quintana seems redundant. We already have enough back of the rotation types and I wouldn't want to spend 10M for another one.
    Darvish, on the other hand, is an interesting thought. If they would eat a chunk of change and trade him for a scrub, and if we could still afford Cole, then yes.

  2. 38 minutes ago, Calzone 2 said:

    I believe that some japanese kid signed with the Royals a couple of seasons ago but I don’t know the circumstances. 

     

    17 minutes ago, Inside Pitch said:

    Yes.  Kaito Yuki signed as a 16 year old last year.   

    The Angels attempted to sign Darvish when he was in HS.   

    So then signing this kid is a viable possibility?

  3. 20 minutes ago, Calzone 2 said:

    If anyone is stressing out over where this guy is going to pitch you probably should know that he hasn’t even been drafted by a Japanese team yet and it could be 3-4 years before he could get posted. Don’t lose your hair over this.

    I'm not going to pretend like I have a inkling how this stuff works, but if he has yet to be drafted, isn't he open to sign with an American team?

  4. 38 minutes ago, AngelStew43 said:

    Eppler took over a train wreck of a farm system, thanks to DiPoto, and you guys think no one else in baseball is paying attention?  The Red Sox are about to face some major payroll issues, especially if Sale and Iovaldi are out long term.  Most of their top prospects have either already made their way to Boston, or have been dealt.  JMO, a guy that can restock a farm system may be what they are looking for.  

    This argument is not without merit.

  5. I disagree that everyone should be tested. Perhaps some laws should be reconstructed to more effectively deal with the respective issues but there are privacy considerations at stake when it comes to government oversight of personal lives. Certainly those of us with a high level of public responsibility need to be (and are) routinely subject to testing, but for the overall public privacy should be the primary concern. 

×
×
  • Create New...