.png.994d0bf2808e959b0fc1cd230c27b6eb.png)
Ordos
-
Posts
1,056 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Gallery
Store
Everything posted by Ordos
-
Because of a different view? No. Because they're a f*cking dickhead? Sure.
-
When was the last time that anyone here read the T&C on a site that explicitly says the advertiser may provide your information to business partners? It's extremely easy for advertisers to get your info, even legally, in ways that don't violate CAN-SPAM. The cure for cancer could be hidden on page 2 of the iTunes T&C, and nobody would ever bother to read it.
-
I don't see how a move does not happen at this point.
-
-
Seems like I'm at an Angels game, circa 2005. 4 innings done, and PR has thrown only 44 pitches to the swing happy USA.
-
You need evidence in government nowadays?
-
Just claim it was in quotation marks, those are alternative facts anyways -
79 people, good sir https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.buzzfeed.com/amphtml/rachelhorner/79-actors-we-can-thank-canada-for
-
Not sure if Craig posted this, would have to sift thru pages of nonsense to find out.
-
Don't the Canadians in show biz already have health care, or at least coverage through SAG?
-
Hey all, posted this on the main board, but figured I'd share for all the loveable miscreants that typically avoid that one. I've got a free 4 pack of tix to Friday's game at Petco available. Wife intended to buy a 4 pack for my birthday, accidentally purchased 4 tix for 4 different days. Send me a PM if interested.
-
Hey all, got a free 4 pack of tix to Friday's game at Petco available. Wife intended to buy a 4 pack for my birthday, accidentally purchased 4 tix for 4 different days. Send me a PM if interested.
-
Took in the first two episodes last night before bed. Thinking of the cute cat helped me get right to sleep.
-
So... you're saying that someone is using a headline that conflicts with the rest of the message, just to drive eyes to the story? Get the f*ck outta here!
-
I don't really see that as different than the article, though. The article points out the intention of using the testing, but as an "optional" part of the coverage. While employers wouldn't be able to force the test, employees would be stuck in a higher pool without. It would not allow hiring/firing decisions, it seems, which would still be covered under ADA.
-
-
-
Better a credit card than debit, at least
-
http://www.mediaquant.net/tag/free-media/
-
Ad retargeting. You'll want to stop searching for that term, or turn off ad tracking
-
Escort services? "Get fucked like America!"
-
Provided they are females, that does sound awesome
-
Weren't you concerned about the Clinton Foundation pay-for-play?
