Jump to content

jsnpritchett

Premium Membership
  • Posts

    20,378
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    98

Posts posted by jsnpritchett

  1. "29. Los Angeles Angels

    An awful system after years of lost first-round picks and trades to bulk up the major league team, it improved marginally in 2013 with some new arms, but regression from most of the top position player prospects in the system was a huge disappointment.

     

    30. Milwaukee Brewers

    There may not be a player in this system who projects as an above-average player in the majors; the best bets are all teenagers who played in low Class A or below in 2013, and none is close to a lock to get there.

    The system lacks ceiling and it lacks depth beyond reliever candidates and likely fourth outfielders, with nothing in the middle of the diamond and no starting pitching of note."

  2. seriously noone is good enough for some of you.  you would nitpick Christ himself... and in before the "are you saying god cant hit a curveball" JoBoo jokes :)

     

    Is he any real piece, no, but he provides depth, a little pop maybe, and a chance for Romine to play everyday at 3B and continue to improve.

     

    i would bet right now that IF Freise goes down Romine gets the call to play everyday over any of Stewart/Mcdonald... but for a few at bats and innings a week i would rather see the young guys playing everyday rather than stunting their development like we have others coughCongercough.

     

    For me Romine and some of the youth dont need to be in ANA unless its to start, but that's just me.  It's a depth signing and organizational move.. nothing more, im fine with it.

    And all the personality stuff everyone wants  to bring up about this guy, Garza, Freise, etc... come on.. are you that perfect?  live you life in the costant spotlight then pop off till then save the hypocrisy

     

    Few notes:

    - Romine isn't really a young guy.  He just turned 28, and has had a least a cup of coffee in the majors in each of the last 4 seasons.  He is what he is at this point, and I can't imagine you're going to see any developmental leaps if he gets more regular playing time again in AAA.

    - I don't think people are making a big deal one way or another about this signing of Stewart.  For me, it's more of a shoulder shrug.  The dude has never come close to living up to his hype, and he has a lousy attitude, too.  If he suddenly resurrects his career, great!  Do I expect it to happen?  Nope.

    - I wouldn't even call what he provides "depth."  He has been absolutely atrocious at the major league and minor league level recently.

  3. I'm not saying he doesn't deserve to be in, or that wins should be a dominant factor in voters' analysis--but history shows that they are.  That's all...I think it might take some time before he gets in, when he gets a vocal advocacy group behind him in the way that Blyleven did, for example.

  4. Halladay was the best, most consistent pitcher of his era; a true ace for 11 of his 16 seasons. Two Cy Young Awards, eight time all-star, five times winning 19 or more games, six seasons with an ERA under 3.00, a postseason no-hitter, 67 complete games, 20 shutouts, and a career record of 203-105.

     

    He's in.

     

    I don't think he's an automatic.  72 MLB pitchers (however loosely you define that term) are in the HOF.  Of those, 53 have more than 203 wins.  Of the remaining 19 pitchers, 5 were primarily known as relievers, 1 is Babe Ruth, 1 was elected to the HOF for his umpiring (Hank O'Day), 1 is Satchel Paige who was obviously elected more for his Negro League legacy, 1 is in because he allegedly invented the curveball (Candy Cummings), and 1 is Sandy Koufax, who is a special case, obviously. 

     

    Addie Joss died in the middle of his career, but was still elected due to how dominant he was.  Monte Ward was a pitcher/infielder hybrid.  Jack Chesbro is in because he won 41 games in a season.  Dizzy Dean is in because he was dominant for a few short years, and then a well-known personality for a long time.

     

    Point being, there's really not much of a history of starters getting in with "only" 203 wins, unless there are special circumstances surrounding their careers or individual accomplishments/legends.  Not sure it'll be an automatic in for Halladay...

  5.  

    Personally, this kid is one of my favorites.  I pride myself on finding a few diamonds in the rough within the Angels system about a year or two before anyone else takes notice (Pat Corbin, Tyler Chatwood, Kole Calhoun and last year Alex Yarbrough)

     

     

    Man, you crack me up sometimes.  "Diamonds in the rough," like Corbin (2nd round pick), Chatwood (2nd round pick), and Yarbrough (4th round pick)?  Yep, no one noticed them at all...

  6. Yet another example of why the HOF has become as meaningless as the Gold Gloves award....  Clowns like this guy get to vote and do crap like this,

     

    _________________

    Wow. Time to surrender your ballot, Ken. “@RedSoxFannnn: @kengurnick only voted for Jack Morris on his HOF ballot. What a disgrace!”

    _________________

     

    http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article/mlb/how-mlbcom-writers-voted-in-hall-of-fame-balloting?ymd=20140106&content_id=66341930&vkey=news_mlb

     

    KEN GURNICK, Dodgers beat reporter

    Morris

    Morris has flaws -- a 3.90 ERA, for example. But he gets my vote for more than a decade of ace performance that included three 20-win seasons, Cy Young Award votes in seven seasons and Most Valuable Players votes in five. As for those who played during the period of PED use, I won't vote for any of them.

     

    I was just about to create a separate post for this.  Unbelievable.  That guy's voting privileges should be pulled immediately.

×
×
  • Create New...