Jump to content

Dave Saltzer

Premium Membership
  • Posts

    1,570
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Dave Saltzer

  1. Congrats to the Shoemakers. Ever since Matt came to our Fanfest, he is one of our guys. Like Calhoun and Morin and all the others, I take tremendous pride in seeing our guys do well and hope life brings them nothing but success and happiness. A first child, and every child, is a blessing.

  2. Here is a different take on the HoF voting. This was the first year that I was able to participate in the Internet Baseball Writers Association of America's (IBWAA) Hall of Fame voting. I took the responsibility very seriously. I am still debating whether or not to publish the names of the players for whom I voted. I respect Jeff Fletcher as a reporter very much, and respect his decision to publish the names of those he voted for to get into Cooperstown, as well as those reporters who do not, and will continue to reflect on my decision to reveal my ballot.

     

    Los Angeles– In its 2015 Hall of Fame election the IBWAA selected Randy Johnson (with 98.24% of the vote), Pedro Martinez (95.15%), John Smoltz (82.82%), Jeff Bagwell (81.94%) and Tim Raines (79.30%). A 75% threshold is required for election.

    Curt Schilling finished in sixth place, with 65.64%. Roger Clemens garnered 64.76% (after receiving 56.64% in 2014) and Barry Bonds received 63.44% (57.52% last year).

    There are 338 members in the IBWAA, of which 227 voted in this election, both essentially doubling last year’s totals.

    Per a group decision in January, 2014, the IBWAA allows members to vote for 15 players, instead of the previous 10, beginning with this election. With their first opportunity to do so, 136 members voted for more than 10 candidates. Fifty-two members voted for 15 players. The average vote per member was 11.084.

    The 2015 IBWAA Hall of Fame ballot compared identically to the BBWAA ballot, with the following exceptions:

    1. Craig Biggio’s name did not appear on the IBWAA ballot because he was elected by the group in 2014.

    2. Mike Piazza’s name did not appear on the IBWAA ballot because he was elected by the group in 2013.

    3. Barry Larkin’s name did appear on the ballot because he has not reached the 75% threshold in an IBWAA election.

    Complete voting results are as follows:

    Player Name

    Votes

    Percentage

    Randy Johnson

    223

    98.24%

    Pedro Martinez

    216

    95.15%

    John Smoltz

    188

    82.82%

    Jeff Bagwell

    186

    81.94%

    Tim Raines

    180

    79.30%

    Curt Schilling

    149

    65.64%

    Roger Clemens

    147

    64.76%

    Barry Larkin

    146

    64.32%

    Mike Mussina

    146

    64.32%

    Barry Bonds

    144

    63.44%

    Edgar Martinez

    129

    56.83%

    Alan Trammell

    113

    49.78%

    Larry Walker

    89

    39.21%

    Mark McGwire

    81

    35.68%

    Gary Sheffield

    74

    32.60%

    Jeff Kent

    70

    30.84%

    Lee Smith

    52

    22.91%

    Fred McGriff

    49

    21.59%

    Sammy Sosa

    46

    20.26%

    Don Mattingly

    35

    15.42%

    Nomar Garciaparra

    17

    7.49%

    Carlos Delgado

    16

    7.05%

    Tony Clark

    4

    1.76%

    Jermaine Dye

    4

    1.76%

    Brian Giles

    4

    1.76%

    Tom Gordon

    3

    1.32%

    Eddie Guardado

    2

    0.88%

    Rich Aurilia

    1

    0.44%

    Cliff Floyd

    1

    0.44%

    Troy Percival

    1

    0.44%

    Aaron Boone

    0

    0.00%

    Darin Erstad

    0

    0.00%

    Jason Schmidt

    0

    0.00%

    Ballot tabulations by Brian Wittig & Associates.

     

  3. Wow! I want him signed by the Angels.

     

    Let's see, Freese is a FA next year, and we have no real replacement for him in the system. There aren't that many high profile 3B available, and if we went the FA route, we'd pay well over $10 million/year to sign one. With his bat speed and base speed, he's got huge upside. Assuming his mental makeup is good, he looks like he could zip through our Minor Leagues like Trout did. Pair him up with Trout, bat him second, that could be very dangerous. 

     

    IMHO, we have to go all-in to sign him.

  4. For a lot less money, and for a lot more interest to Angels fans, why not go out to many (if not all) of our Minor League affiliates, such as the IE 66ers, the Orem Owlz, and the Salt Lake Bees? Minor League baseball is a hell of a lot of fun, less expensive, and fan friendly. You could also hit all the Cal League parks (and see why you NEVER put home plate facing west--I'm looking at you Lancaster). Either of those are realistic trips, and can be done on a budget.

  5. I really do NOT see the point in this. We can get similar, if not better, production from the guys we have than from Drew for a LOT less money. If we aren't going to somehow spend the money on Scherzer (and trading Wilson to stay under the luxury tax), we'd be far better off holding onto the money and using it in the season and/or near the trade deadline to shore up any needs we have throughout the season. 

     

    Pass on Drew.

     

    Pass on Boras.

  6. If we can get one or both of these top Cuban prospects, we need to do it. I know about the penalties, but, our farm is truly in need of some top tied D talent and we need to start building for a future team around Trout. If we are going to be a perennially contending team, that means that we will always be drafting near the bottom of the pack and will have one of th lowest spending amounts. With such restrictions, it makes far more sense to binge every few years and get some waves of talent to rise up to the parent club so that we can may tain our winning ways. For the cost of one Hamilton, we could have one Baldoquin, one Moncada, and, one Lopez, with money to spare. It's a better risk, and depending how these deals are structured, they might not have the same impact on the luxury tax that signing of Hamilton will have.

    Count me in for signing these two guys (Moncada and Lopez).

  7. They can sign Moncada still...and they might as well just pony up and do it. They're effectively out of doing much in the International market the next 2 years, so spend away right now.

    Agreed. I don't believe that money would count towards any luxury tax, and would still be a far bigger bargain than trying to sign a comparable FA. Since we've already blown our allotment for the international market, we might as well go in all the way on it and sign Moncado.

×
×
  • Create New...