RallyMo

A pretty awesome mentor is with the team on the trip...

http://www.mercurynews.com/sports/ci_30277615/cal-footballs-australia-trip-no-brainer

Maybe I should have specified that she seems to think she's submitting entries in a creative writing competition. There's generally no excuse for improper use of the language.

Agreed, but neither does the post I was responding to if the article linked was read. Go Bears!

I haven't been involved in this thread much and I sure as heck am not going to perform a deep dive, but it's time that I get involved, cause somebody out there is grinding my gears with their posts. We have a family friend that talks about everyday things in a manner that suggests she's of the notion that she's submitting her posts for judgment in a writing competition. Look, man, it's Facebook. Nobody's going to name you the official poet freaking laureate of Facebook. Just tell us what's happening if you wish and leave it at that. My guess is that 95% of the people that read her posts vomit within 2 minutes of finishing them.

By taxing the UCLA fanbase, of course. Thanks, suckers!

Not bad... http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/pac12/2016/08/19/cal-bears-hawaii-warriors-college-football-sydney-australia-trip/88966056/

Well, I think that's pretty indicative of what the norm might be without a public FD. There wouldn't be a blanket service area.

It's hopeless this year and next, but it's truly full of hope if they can start rebuilding the farm. There's a lot of wasted money coming off the books.

This should have started with "In Seattle..." rather than what we see.

Parsing the language of his suggestion that somebody could assassinate Clinton and considering tense, he's a real douchecanoe.

Yes, but he's a far worse alternative.

They feel silent, apparently.

You never leave the Navy. He's married to the sea for life.

Hands off Garbers, you filthy bastards.

Gotcha.

Wait, you lose part of the reduction that each dependent provides per 1k?

Doesn't claiming a qualifying dependent reduce your taxable income?

POTY

Just because Bernie gave in like that doesn't mean that Christie didn't jump on the FlipFlop Suck Up Express.

Fixed in an effort to combine your feelings

Absolutely. They couldn't figure out how to do something coordinated to save their lives if the situation called for it.

Right, but that's kind of a cop out when it comes to the question. Both of us (I presume you'll be voting for your hashtag buddy) will be casting a vote for Gary Johnson come election day, but at the end of the day unless a significant and welcome change occurs it's evident that either Trump or Clinton will be end up being our next President. While it's truly easy to say that one thinks that they would both be horrible in their own special way, it's certainly possible to pick which one you feel has the potential to the least amount of damage. As far as I'm concerned, Trump has the greatest potential for calamity. He's constantly saying shit that is troubling and truly not all that distanced from slippery slope to an extremely disconcerting future rife w/ censorship and blanket mistreatment of large groups of people. On the other hand, if one dismisses it as "he couldn't possibly actually think like that and act upon it," exactly what is the guy going to do? He's quite a liar, as well. Clinton, on the other hand, is seemingly bought and paid for and extension of what we've already been going through for 36 or more years now. She's also apparently not all that well disciplined in areas where it counts re: information security. She's quite a liar. So, of the two that the general public will likely vote for, who do you see as causing more harm than the other when everything is weighed out?

How can you even type that you have issues with him being a sell out? You had Chris Christie's nuts so securely in your mouth that it took a fire station's worth of personnel manning the jaws of life to release just one of them so that you could make room for one of Trump's.