Jump to content

Inside Pitch

Premium Membership
  • Posts

    23,031
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    122

Posts posted by Inside Pitch

  1. 27 minutes ago, jsnpritchett said:

    Again, my point isn't which is better and I wasn't asking. My point is simply that there are multiple ways to calculate the stat that is generally referred to as WAR (and a secondary point, which I've made before, is that even most hard-core fans have no idea what actually goes into it), and long-term, I don't think that's good for the history of the sport.

    That's all. I'm not sure why what I said has led to multiple diversions and explanations.

    I like data, and I find discussing the various different stats in MLB interesting. I've probably derailed a few threads as a result.

    The "why are there different versions" comes up often and for many (not saying you), it's what they point to in order to discredit it's merits. There's a guy on Twitter who constantly posts career WAR totals using bWAR comparing players who offensively it's obvious one player was significantly better than the other and yet the WAR favors the weaker bat.  He does it knowing full well he's completely ignoring the defensive component of WAR but casual fans cling to it like gospel.

    I understand you're not interested, but I offered the initial "insight" in case anyone else who might wonder about it.

    And just to be a pain in the ass -- fWAR is still better than bWAR, in case anyone was wondering if anything may have changed in the last 90 or so minutes..

  2. 3 hours ago, Angels 1961 said:

    For Angels to get best prospect for Anderson they should pay down some of his contract. Anderson has had a good couple of months, but money owned and a regression in performance could be coming.

    I don't know if they need to but they should offer to pay the remainder of any and every expiring contract they try to move if it means getting a better prospect ...It's not like there is any concern they will cross over the luxury cap.

    I really don't give a shit that Arte didn't blow a grip of money chasing names this winter but I'd be bent if he could pay to get better prospects and chose not to.  

  3. 6 hours ago, jsnpritchett said:

    I'm not even making a case for which WAR is "better." I'm just saying I think it's silly that there are different versions of a metric that's called the same thing by various sources. 

    Well if you're wondering which one is better -- it's fWAR.

    The genesis for all the WARs can be traced to Keith Woolner and his VORP stat but Bill James had been hinting at and working towards something meant to measure player value as early as 1982.  I think the reason there are least three different versions plus JAWS is because they are still trying to perfect it. IMHO the defensive component of WAR will always make for some seriously wonky results.  

    People are almost better off knowing where each of the versions of WAR are flawed and trying to find the common ground between them.

    Regardless of which version people choose to use, any weighted stat is better than any of the traditional raw data.

     

  4. 2 hours ago, jsnpritchett said:

    ...though he's 115th in pitcher WAR if you use Fangraphs' system, which favors FIP instead of actual results.  That's one of the biggest gaps between the two systems that I've seen recently (and another reason that I think WAR can sometimes be a silly metric, since there's no agreement on how to calculate it).

    He's like in the 500s when using WARP too.  

    I'm a fan of FIP, but I'm aware of it's biases and it's propensity to ignore guys with low K rates but overall it's a better starting point IMO than RA/9.  Anderson is living off a ridiculously low BABip right now, he's got a slightly elevated walk rate but he's sporting the 3rd lowest BaBiP in MLB.

    Teams know what he is and what he isn't -- but just by virtue of being left-handed he hold value.  The concerns about Ward's slump are IMO overstated as well.  Teams know what he is too, smart teams don't make decisions based on small samples.

  5. 8 hours ago, Blarg said:

    Maybe you forgot about the moth eater in the 80's up in the cheap seats at Angels stadium. The lights would attract these very large moths, scared the crap out of my wife one night when one nose dived into her drink.

    There was a guy that would tell people in that area he would eat as many moths as people would pay per moth. So he would gather up money and then snatch them out of the air and gulp them down. 

    Between the moths and the moth eater, Carol refused to sit in the upper deck ever since. 

    Was going yo say this very thing.  Every so often he'd have a moth off where someone would challenge him to see who could eat the most -- he was a machine. That same section in the third deck (LF/3B corner) was where the flying tortillas would "originate" from.  My brother and I used to beg our Dad to let us go sit up there

  6. On 5/22/2024 at 6:46 PM, BTH said:

    yes, but I don't see him gaining ~3 mph in average exit velocity the next few years.

    I'd be surprised if he didn't ... It's not just a strength thing, as he learns the leagues, the parks, and the pitchers, he'll learn when/where to let it rip.

    Miller has always been my favorite baseball writer because despite being a early disciple of sabermetric principles he never went full blown robot, he's always allowed/considered player agency.  The biggest most insightful comment made in that article wasn't the math stuff but rather where he ends it by saying Nolan is making the decision to be short to the ball.  That's where experience will kick in, that's where we will likely see the biggest increases in bat speed/exit velocity. 

    Pull rate on FBs has long been the been one of, if not the best predictor of future success, a sign that the player can identify and swing hard at the FB. Schanuel was promoted before he had any real time to show that ability, his success was entirely built on bat control.  The fact that his walk rate has dropped is an indication he's not yet mastered it and is hitting defensively, but I'd be shocked if he doesn't. He will never be a power guy, but he could be a doubles machine, something the nerdy stuff in that article pointed to.

     

     

  7. 6 hours ago, SlappyUtilityMIF said:

    Power is always the last developed skill set, as it is lift... Sorry. Usually, it's gap to gap power that a player comes in with = extra base hits that could project to lift as the player adds weight and matures.

    Veteran skills. 

    The attempts to force power out of him were misguided.  

×
×
  • Create New...