It was in response to this:
"I am so glad that Trout did not get a ridiculous contract like Stanton is about to. I have no idea why owners are still okay with paying so much to one player."
Players should make as much as someone is willing to pay them. Do you want someone to tell you that you can only earn so much because a rule dictates it?
Historically, I can't think of any team that has had success bringing back a player of marginally utility....let alone bringing back any former players...unless of course its is to retire their number.
I posted nothing negative. All I said is that we should have been able to win 103 games based on some of your WAR projections. 103 would be the best win total of any Angel Teams...it's a shame we won't be able to get there without him.
The Perils of Democracy...where only 20% of the electorate are educated enough to understand how public policy enough to make decisions on whether or not to implement public policy while the other 80% are pacified by a material world and lack of motivation to do anything to make it better.