Jump to content

Jim

Members
  • Posts

    1,581
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jim

  1. I have and you're mostly correct. He would be slightly better option than the current platoon in LF, but not by much.
  2. Saturday - Jan 9, 2016 Kansas City(-3) Cincinnati(+2.5) Sunday - Jan 10, 2016 Minnesota(+5.5) Green Bay(+1)
  3. Niether are mutually exclusive. Hope you ALL have a great year.
  4. With as much as these guys fly, I would have thought the plane crash scares would have come more frequently.
  5. I wanna hold the V between the two A's, please.
  6. Assuming we get to the back end all that much, a commitee of Salas, Smith, and Street will be eaten alive. Mostly due to Salas being the first to be devoured. Our bullpen needs help, and yet our new leader has managed to make things worse. I hope that changes before March.
  7. I would take this bet in a minute, but I just can't bet against the guy I'm rooting for to win.
  8. Does anyone have any idea who's leading this contest?
  9. This seems to be the prevailing sentiment. Man I hope there's no truth to it.
  10. I have absolutely no numbers to back this up, but agree with this entirely. All players being equal, I'd take the guy from the AL.
  11. Might be time to switch teams.
  12. Sunday- December 27 Minnesota(-6) Tampa Bay(-3) Carolina(-7) Buffalo(-6) New Orleans(-3.5) San Francisco(+9) Kansas City(-12.5) Miami(0) NY Jets(+3) Tennessee(-4.5) Arizona(-4.5) Seattle(-13.5) Baltimore(+10) Monday - December 28 Cincinnati(+3.5) at Denver(-3.5)
  13. I'm Irish, we all know where I'll be.
  14. I wonder what stickboy would say to that? ha Speaking of which, is he gone or has he changed his name?
  15. You seriously didn't see the sarcasm in that statement. If I have in any way insulted the dedicated hard working men and women of the US government, I apologize. And since we're on the subject, if you have a lead on a job in the 200,000 range with benefits, I would appreciate a shout out.
  16. Ok I'm in...who are we doing this for again?
  17. If you wanted an honest response from the libs on this site, why then would you write such a malicious, mostly juvenile description of the candidates?
  18. Was this meant to be a satirical rant on the political party you are not aligned with? Or, are you sincerely curious about whom one might choose as their candidate for the presidency?
×
×
  • Create New...