The problem I have with the "Contact" play...is having a runner go on any contact. The guy on 3rd should be able to decide.
If the ball is grounded to the right side of 2nd..it is a decent play. (again depending on the score, who is on deck, etc)
A ground ball to short or 3rd is almost always a sitting duck situation.
To me, (and this is clearly IMO), the total "contact play"...meaning the player goes home on any contact...is a bad play. No better than a squeeze, and "probability" wise, worse.
One of my biggest beefs with Scioscia is, and always has been, his tendency to play for ONE run.
Look at this new lineup. This is a power style AL lineup.
My opinion is, with this team, unless you are trying to TIE a game in the late innings, and you are playing at home and have a bunch of slumping players coming to bat next, and have nobody on the bench that can get the ball out of the infield....
The contact play is a chump bet.
It is a low percentage, 1 run, desperation move, IMO equal to a squeeze bunt.
NOT something that should even be considered before the 7th or 8th inning.
My problem with the way Scioscia uses it, is he uses it in early and middle innings.
Scioscia needs to stay out of this 2013 Angel team's way, and let them play for big innings....not micro-manage to manufacture single runs.