Jump to content

HBMike

Members
  • Posts

    256
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by HBMike

  1. 5 minutes ago, Dochalo said:

    he's a market disruptor and a lot of rules go out the window for him.  you basically have to go above any market ceiling by a decent amount for the total number and then spread it out over an number of years.  In other words, you're paying him 400m .  Whether you spread that out over 10 years, 8 years, 12 years, whatever.  The longer you can spread it out, the better.  

    No team will give him 400m, you’ve been listening to the fake news. The largest contract is 320m by a owner who wanted to sell his team. Won’t happen. 350m maybe, if the Angels extend him this year. 

  2. 23 minutes ago, GrittyVeterans said:

    Disagree. He can get 10/400 from any team. He wouldn't be foolish to want to get his pick of where he plays. 

    If he truly only wants to be an Angel, then it's a different story.

    But it's not "foolish" for him to want to test the market

    Not when he will be turning 30 and starting his decline years 2 to 3 years in and no DH in the NL. No team will offer him that. 

  3. http://www.todaysknuckleball.com/inside-baseball-with-jon-heyman/yankee-intrigue-trade-gap-arod/

    Los Angeles Angels

    "Brandon Marsh, the second round pick, originally had a deal with the Angels and while there’s word some medical issue complicated things (some say it’s his back, but the principles won’t comment), the sides remain in talks. Angels GM Billy Eppler says the team is “hopeful” to do a deal with Marsh. And why not? He is said to be a five-tool outfielder, someone any team would want, much less the top-heavy Angels, who have two great outfielders for now. While Marsh was quoted at one point as saying, “I’m not signing,” folks aren’t sure where things stood at that juncture. Marsh does have options, as he could attend Kennesaw State, but baseball people say he has a bright future in pro baseball. If the Angels don’t land him, this will continue a star-crossed year for them (they lost five starting pitchers, which might be some sort of record) …"

     

  4. Absolutely NOT. Blackmon should be a fine defensive LF, and he should still hit 10 HR's and swipe 30 bags for the Angels. However, a .250 BA and .300 OBP doesn't improve us by much in LF. Tropeano's probably our third or fourth best starter right now. I'd just as soon keep Treopano and wait until more payroll frees up than trade Tropeano for Blackmon.

    As I said before, I'd do Kubitza and a prospect like Alcantara for Blackmon, that's it.

    Tropeano should be off-limits. 6 years of a mid rotation starter is worth more than 3 of a slightly better than replacement level LF.

    Tropeano Shouldn't be off-limits and he's Not a mid rotation starter, he's a back end stater. That being said I wouldn't move him for Blackmon.
  5. I'll believe it when it becomes OFFICIAL! Barring injuries, the Angels are going to regret not signing him!

    First off if the Angels offered the same contract as the Dodgers he would still be a Dodger, they would have to overpay. Also scouts think he's a #3 and Keith Law said a #4, time will tell but I doubt highly the Angels will regret it , even if he's good.
  6. Let's hope that the Dodgers use some of their EXCESS players too acquire a right handed starter now and eventually thin out the Maeda sweepstakes!

    Why? Most scouts say Maeda is a #4 starter nothing special and then you have to pay 20M upfront. The Doyers have said they won't get in a bidding for Maeda, they don't consider him a top of rotation starter.

  7. Trading sp to NYY for refsnyder makes way too much sense.....won't h

    Me and u have been on the BART for the last 2-3 yrs. Won't happen either

    Why would you want to give up pitching for a player that the Yankees didn't think was good enough to start for them? That's a terrible idea. Also Eppler knows him better the any of you and if doesn't think he's worth trading for, then I would trust him.
×
×
  • Create New...