Jump to content

cals

Premium Membership
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    34,394

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    60

 Content Type 

Everything posted by cals

  1. cals
    Yeah but he doesn’t have a temperpedic.
  2. cals
    Likely
  3. cals
    Ha ha. Try fighting the OG strain with no vax and nothing but famotidine and miller lite, MF'er.
  4. cals
    They all do it man, there is no impartiality anymore from either side. And like I said, it is what it is. But Tucker and his minions need to man up and admit the right is doing it, too. We are men of action, KC. Lies do not become us.
  5. cals
    He ha, then he misnamed himself!
  6. cals
    I’m no real expert anymore either. I just want everyone to know most, if not all judges (these days, at least) have an outcome in mind first and find a way to bend and mold the legal precedent and the text of the document itself to reach that conclusion. They have a political position first and the legal reasoning comes second, which is backwards. It is what it is, but listening to Carlsbad spew Fox propaganda that good conservatives follow strict constructionism and don’t do exactly what the more liberal judges do was becoming annoying so I felt the need to say something. Now that I’ve put him in his place and made him look like a jackass I’ll step back on this topic again and let the amateurs discuss.
  7. cals
    One of the Star Wars Inquisitors is a Ducks fan? Cool!
  8. cals
    You can't change an amendment.
  9. cals
    Nope
  10. cals
    No! We must read the constitution as written. It is not a changeable document!
  11. cals
    It would appear Branco backpedaled.
  12. cals
    But alas it's what I have to do,
  13. cals
    paging @Dtwncbad!
  14. cals
  15. cals
  16. cals
    You're starting to go full Lifetime.
  17. cals
    Odd that you made this statement when you were basically telling Taylor the only true way to interpret the Constitution was through strict constructionism. What you fail to understand as to why I called you out for being a dumbass is that "strict constructionism" is a fallacy itself. Even those that purport to provide opinions based on it are doing the same as anyone else. Reading the document in a manner to suit their political needs. At this point strict constructionism is just a Fox buzzword that dummies throw out when they don't know what the fuck they are talking about.
  18. cals
    Or gay for that matter.
  19. cals
    No, Jay isn’t stupid.
  20. cals
    I have a Saul bobblehead in my office. I don’t take it as an insult. And if you’re too stupid to understand how a lawyer knows more about constitutional law than a pipe fitter or toll booth worker or whatever downtown Carlsbad is, then I don’t know what to say. You understand that Constitutional law classes are an integral part of the law school curriculum, correct?
  21. cals
    Somebody’s crushing!
  22. cals
    He hid it so well,
  23. cals
    I like that @Taylor called @SurfWriter a confident buffoon. Not sure if it’s accurate but let’s see how it plays out.
  24. cals
    Who had a slightly crooked d1ck,
  25. cals
    It wasn’t what you hope it was. It’s Mexico dude, that behavior is practically required down there.
×
×
  • Create New...