RallyMo

Any updates, guys?

Tankstradamus.

Your affinity for UC Berkeley quarterbacks is noted, you filthy hippie.

Either way: more turnover in the White House.

I bet UCLA, USC, Cal (under Martin, maybe) were all involved in this garbage. Arizona: of course. I'm hoping our new head coach is clean, but guess where he was before joining Martin at Cal? Louisville.

I knooooooow. That's how bad Trump is. Even a neverdem like Tank has tho distance himself.

Yep. Tank's a Trump guy.

She's wrong. They're wrong. Everybody in this situation is wrong.

https://www.wired.com/story/free-speech-week-milo-best-troll-yet

That's exactly what he said!

There are many Republican things about me.

I guess I'd pick 1. Speaking of people that have disappeared to a secret island as far as this sub forum is concerned. . . @Jay, what would you pick?

I dunno.

Fwfwfwfwfwfwfwfw

Are they interpreting in the same manner that the dummies in the comments on that page did? Whenever I see that frog being used, it's generally a sign that the person using it and those retweeting and reposting affirmatively don't engage that much in the practice of critical analysis/thinking. Dumdums.

I don't think this means what the people commenting on the page that @Adam linked to think it means. It seems clear to me that this is a well calculated play on sheer numbers and that ads which would promote notions counter to a person's belief were shown to them to make them react negatively. It's like when I used to see ads pumping up the Red Sox games and how great they and their stories are, except it's actually targeted. (My thought: "Screw the Red Sox.") All it did was make me hate the Red Sox more (hate is a relative term here). In one of the images on the page that's linked to, it says "If you want to keep up the Russia narrative, then you have to concede the Russians thought the best way to get Trump elected was to promote Hillary Clinton." While I'm not sure that they thought it was the best way, it most certainly would be part of the way. That's pretty savvy, honestly. We've seen it on this board: some people HATE Hillary. I bet Blarg had a bit of vomit in his throat each time he saw a Hillary ad.

Nailed it: http://www.theonion.com/article/veteran-told-what-offends-him-57045?utm_content=Main&utm_campaign=SF&utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=SocialMarketing

Goff is doing exactly what he's capable of. You never know if a guy will keep it up, but it was clear to me last year that nothing was in place to put him and the offense in any sort of a position to succeed. I've probably watched more of him than most, and the throws that he's making are exactly what he did in school. He can put the ball in places that only his guys can get to. He just needs some protection and receivers that are competent. People that were judging him on the basis of last year clearly weren't considering how terrible his coaching, protection and receiving was last year. Sure, he may still fail yet, but at least he has a reasonable chance to succeed now.

Seriously, though. . . With all the Milo love professed by some here earlier in the thread, I was expecting an update on his triumphant and well planned return to Berkeley. Nothing yet. Oh well.

You only have yourself to blame for the expectations that you erroneously set, stupid. Now, let's get back to discussing @LHalo's framed Little Mermaid poster. . .

Probably?

Her urge to blame people is almost as strong as your urge to post about her. Almost.

It's possible. There's just no room for errors, especially of the type and quantity that were made, when a team like Cal is playing a team that has everything like USC. If that pass that went through hands in the end zone is caught, I think we may have won. It didn't help when Anderson missed the FG. I think Bowers panicked when we seemed to abandon the run and felt it was all on his shoulders. He made some very bad pass attempts.

Yet still somehow less depressing than baseball. Thanks, Angels!

So you enjoy his antics in a case like this?