BTH

I would do that deal from an Angels perspective, but I don't think the Rays would. And if the Rays wanted to do that deal, I'd be concerned because the Rays are generally smarter than other teams. It would lead me to believe that they know something about Snell that others don't.

So both Dahl and Renfroe have signed for right around $3 million. I'd imagine that the Angels would look to pick up an outfielder in a similar price range as them.

If that's the case, then my bad. That would explain why it's never done.

One benefit of Suzuki would be that he presumably wouldn't require a large contract, which would give the Angels more financial flexibility in other areas. I do, again, question whether he is a good defensive catcher, but maybe Minasian knows something about Suzuki's defense that fans don't.

So a lot of people are bringing up the MLBPA not allowing that, but can the MLBPA really do anything? I can see why they'd be upset, but it's not against the rules. Until it's written in the rules, isn't is a loophole that can be exploited?

The Angels don't need him to waive his no trade clause. Here's why: Say the Angels wanted to trade Justin Upton and Prospect X to Team Y for a PTBNL/Cash Considerations. The Angels could agree with Team Y that we will trade you Prospect X if you take on Justin Upton in exchange for a PTBNL/Cash Considerations. If Upton declines to waive his no-trade clause, you work the agreement with Team Y so that they agree to claim Upton on waivers when you put him on waivers. You then put him on waivers, the team picks him up, and the deal is done. Now you could say “what if Team Y doesn’t pick Upton up on waivers like they agreed to?” Well, they could work out the deal so that Team Y gets a PTBNL/Cash Considerations and that PTBNL/Cash Considerations is only Prospect X IF team Y claims Upton. Otherwise it’s just cash considerations (or $1). Players with no-trade clauses can be put on waivers, and this is thus a workaround for any no-trade clause.

If GM's are smart (and most of them should be since they are Ivy League guys) they know that you can easily work around a no trade clause. The Angels can easily work around Upton's no trade clause.

I honestly don't think having a no trade clause is a big deal. There are ways you can work around those. Getting someone to take Upton and his salary (even if you are attaching a prospect) is the bigger issue.

I think it's gonna drag out. I don't think he's randomly going to sign at 3 pm on a random Tuesday. I think he'll announce it live or something, and it likely won't be till January/February.

Suzuki makes sense considering the Minasian connection with Atlanta, but is Suzuki really a good defensive catcher? The defensive metrics out there say he is a bad defensive catcher. Last season, he was in the 4th percentile in framing and was worth -4 DRS. For his career, his DRS is -76, and he's only had 4 out of 14 seasons where he had a positive DRS ('08, '09, '10, and '17).

I'd do it, especially if it lowers the Rays asking price on Snell.

Is Reyes out of options? FanGraphs says he still has 1 year of options left.

The Angels heavy involvement with McCann is even further proof that they are committed to adding a catcher. I'm interested to see where they go from here because, besides Realmuto, Molina and maybe Zunino, the rest of the options seem like platoon options/backups. Ramos may be a starting catcher, but he doesn't seem to have the defense the Angels would want.

Watson reportedly interviewed for the Angels GM job, so it turns out that the Angels were able to get 2 executives from among their GM candidates without having to give the PBO and GM title. I was wrong, and it's good to see that the Angels are adding front office talent.

This is something I do have some questions about. I don't know if trading with the Reds already means that a Gray deal won't happen, but it has to change the chances. The question is, does the chance of Gray being traded to the Angels increase or decrease? It could increase because we know that the Angels and Reds have a working relationship. However, it could decrease because if they were going to do it, they might have already done it (like you said). I'd have to think that the chances that two teams strike two deals of significant magnitude with each other in the same offseason are lower.

The chances that all of Adell, Marsh, Adams, Martinez, Knowles, Ramirez, and Deveaux develop are EXTREMELY low and it's completely unrealistic to think that they will all develop. Yes, they have a number of OF prospects to deal from, but it'd be inaccurate to say that they "don't have room" for all of them because it's very unlikely that they all develop.

Yeah, he's probably one of the first guys who they'd look to DFA if their 40-man roster is full. However, it's still a ways away from being full, as it's only at 35.

One thing this shows is that the Angels truly need to add a quality outfielder. While Adell/Marsh/Schebler/Upton/Ward could put together good production, they shouldn't count on it. Adding a quality outfielder gives insurance for both LF and RF.

It'd be kind of sad and funny if Eppler just didn't think the Angels needed pitchers.

I also wouldn't have minded Dahl at 3 million, but I wonder if the Angels want more of a sure thing if they sign a RF'er. Dahl's injury issues and bad 2020 leave some cause for concern. If they are going to sign someone to play over Adell/Ward, perhaps it will only be someone who they definitively know will be an upgrade.

Again, is this account really reputable? I've seen nothing to convince me that he's legitimate. Maybe I missed something that would establish his credibility?

Bauer- 6/180M. Springer- 5/$130M. Realmuto- 5/$130M. McCann- Mets: 4/$40M.

I'm not even sure if Marquez is avaliable. "Márquez would certainly net them the biggest return in a trade, but the Rockies are hoarding him like a gold-plated diamond."

The most Angels scenario would be he signs here and then fully tears his UCL and needs TJ.

440 Trendon (14 HR)