Make Angels Great Again

It seems we are indeed, pretty shit at RISP. We're ranked 28th. The teams OPS+ drops from 100 to 62.

I'm white, raised in Westminster. So that means i'm part white, asian, and mexican. I got the good traits of all of them tho.

The good vibes cat is amazing.

I'm completely shocked that Taylor owns two cats.

Of course there's gonna be blowback after the overturning. But it'll eventually quiet down, and that'll be that. So up until Roe, Arizona had a 100 year old law that stood the test of time? Ok. Sounds like it was working as intended. I don't get why the age of a law matters. I'm pretty sure the law against murder is older than that. And here is the forever old debate. "Abortion is healthcare" "My body my choice" "Abortion is murder" "Let people do whatever they want" No one is going to convince anyone else at this point to re-consider their view on it. A large part of society thinks its fine, another large part thinks its so immoral to the point of criminality. Round and round we go. Unless the constitution changes on this subject, nothing will happen federally.

Democrats truly have a gift for destruction.

The Roe v Wade decision is what made it a toxic issue for decades. It was a bullshit decision that was finally corrected. And now the country can properly address the issue, by leaving it to the states and we can move on. You should be thanking Trump for helping to move us past this divisive issue.

Cool, no one said that. Since, as far as I know, no woman has given birth to anything besides a human, I don’t think religion is required to know what’s growing inside her.

No, what's a stupid argument is the 1972 ruling which held that abortion is a protected right in the constitution. Hence, the ruling was reversed, at it should have been. Because it's not in the fucking constitution.

It's not possible either way at the federal level. Either for a ban or enshrined as a right. It simply won't pass constitutional muster. This issue needs to go away.

What a nice start.

David Ortiz is a guy that comes to mind who hit with the bases occupied a lot. At least I would think. His PAs were split almost exactly 50/50 across his career of men on vs empty bases.

Don't know how to measure it across a large group of players, but the example given: trout : 40.9% of his career PAs or 2685 total PAs with men on soriano : 40.8% of his career PAs or 3431 total PAs with men on

I was young, and so were you

I don’t know how this morphed into an ino thread, but now I’m craving a double double. That middle Tennessee location needs to get a move on

I hate these assholes so much

O’holy shit

We got em right where we want em! let’s go boys

The E Jean Carrol case? The "fraud" case in NY? The democrats are playing a game of throw everything at the wall and see what sticks.

I'm sure all those cases being brought just after his presidency is just a coincidence.

Right wingers skus. lmao! They're such idoits. Man i'm a genious for seeing it.

I'll ask Bibi at lunch tomorrow, thanks for the reminder. Or, I could just use my big beautiful brain.

This may surprise you, but in a just world, cases are judged on their merit. Not whether the perp is right or left leaning. To ideologically captured wing nuts, sure.

You seem upset. Joseph Rosenbaum's victims will be better for this, I promise.