RallyMo

Gary, dude. I wasn't trying to be tricky with my wording. I suppose there could have been another candidate, though. Or maybe there was the possibility of abstaining, but nah.

I'd vote for Gary over Stein.

Vote your conscience. Screw these two windbags that we have as "choices."

Or if you do it behind the backs of the Bushes while helping to fund terrorism that directly terminates the lives of thousands of Americans.

Nah. Don't do that. Vote your conscience and make a statement. You live in California, right? I'm not sure a Trump vote there will even move the needle slightly. Don't lump yourself in with people that truly are stupid enough to think that Trump is a remotely good choice for President. He's a freaking disaster.

Yuck.

They're "empty" calories.

So the counter is an incident in which the charges of plagiarism were brought up by Trump's current opponent? Well then, okey dokey.

http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/2014/10/1/6876479/alds-schedule-2014-angels-royals

Yep. Reps don't give a crap at all. They just eat it up.

Lighting oneself on fire in response to what's going on inside is perhaps the most sensible thing happening either inside or outside of the convention site.

I'm fairly certain that I whispered that to cals with the understanding that it was said in confidence. My trust has been shattered.

What's that?

Wow, your Zing-O-Matic needs to be recalibrated.

Not that it's relevant to this, but did you get an Xbox One yet?

More details about the toxic environment Harrington and Dykes created from a former player: http://www.scout.com/college/california/story/1686172-former-walk-details-harringtons-methods

So, the statue should be back up, right?

What else is new, though. That's what makes Cal what it is. This is all old news conveniently re released two days before a contract is due to be renewed. The Chronicle article is severely biased. But let's not limit discussion to the big Bears, how's the five star crew with the identical record doing?

Webb named to Maxwell award watch list: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000672994/article/2016-maxwell-award-watch-list

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/king-isis-terrorists-aren-muslims-evil-men-article-1.2699463

Here's everything you need to know about our QB situation: http://www.dailycal.org/2016/06/29/2016-cal-football-quarterback . I'm hopeful. I might make it out for a game this year. The home schedule is loaded: Texas, Oregon, UCLA, Washington, Utah and Stanford.

I appreciate how reasonable the logic makes me look. It's so inarguably rock solid that I'm fairly certain I won't look silly if I mock somebody that believes differently on this issue.

So, I think I'm doing this right... Item is designed to kill/harm people in manner that makes other avenues seem inefficient. Item is used by a person intent on murdering someone else in a manner that is very effective. In an effort to achieve prophylaxis, I'm now supposed to suggest that we ban an item not designed to inflict murder but that certainly could be. I think I'll choose a Apple Watch. One could be force-fed to a person and certainly cause death. Ban Apple Watches!

Ban all cars!