RallyMo

Were you ever able to get to the bottom of the "Case Of The Cut Feed?"

I dunno, but @DowningRules is sure to be pissed about the traffic on behalf of people near these year 1 campaign rallies that just want to get from point A to point B. I forsee a new thread from him on this topic in 3, 2.. nah.

This statement is the kind of thing that makes my brain short circuit.

This is insane.

http://money.cnn.com/2017/08/22/media/breitbart-prank-emails/index.html Maybe not going to war on behalf of him, but "for" him?

We'll see. It's not good, that's for sure. One thing that is intriguing is that mention of ditching Edwards Stadium and building housing. He seems to write it off as being inconsequential even if they do that, but that's a fairly large parcel of land not getting much use on an increasingly crowded campus, and I'm pretty sure it's under control of the AD. To build housing there, it'd have to be transferred out of the AD, and I imagine that will involve a shift of a considerable amount of funds from the general campus to the AD. It's not like the AD would be building a dorm on its dime and then trying to recoup the cost on that. I think such a deal could make a significant impact on the outlook here. Then again, maybe not. Whatever the case, it is and will continue to be ugly. GO BEARS!

These MFers: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexmorrell/2015/07/01/the-oxycontin-clan-the-14-billion-newcomer-to-forbes-2015-list-of-richest-u-s-families/

I think that's a fair way of looking at it. Another thing to consider is that while alcohol has more or less remained the same product for decades (centuries), opioids have changed considerably over the years and have evolved to get us to the situation we find ourselves in now. There's no reason to believe that this increase in deaths will reverse or even slow without intervention. With that said, this does not diminish how destructive alcohol is at all.

Chin up, Trump voter!

How's the wall coming along? Excellent thread.

Bachelor In Paradise! Spill the beans, MFer.

It figures that you'd consider this representative of an oppressor.

Everybody is like that, goofball.

The only thing that routinely changes in this White House is the information that comes out of it. It's SOP, pretty much.

Ah, he resigned. Tony Reagins resigned, too.

Ummmm, I think that strengthens it, no? He's going to fight the people that he thinks are detrimental to Trump in the White House (and elsewhere), apparently. Also, do you have anything bad to say about your dear leader after this past week?

Yep. Universities should generally allow for free expression of ideas. Obviously safety is an issue in these times, but we cannot block the speech of individuals.

Geeee, I wonder why?

Nah. You've got your casino, Biff.

There's no way you'd have supported Bernie openly here if you were using it for improving your standing in arguments on AW.

Agreed. Also, why are you hiding your amazing development of a time machine from the rest of the world?

Yep. It's comforting to know that her career is going to be limited by a statement like this and that she'll never attain a position of incredible power. Voters at large are more responsible and higher standards than necessary to do that. Also, when they realize that they've enabled a jackass like that, they're of enough backbone and are respectable enough to turn away and not double down on such a monster.

She surely shouldn't remain in office.

Can I just point out how freaking amazing your post here is? You go from the above, in which you say that her statements may cause others to perform actions that cause damage and hate to saying the following immediately below it: ...which basically says that the actions of a person are not caused by "outside sources" as a person owns their own actions.

I C WUT U DID THERE.