Jump to content

Angels_Fan

Members
  • Posts

    224
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Angels_Fan

  1. It wouldn’t be for Darvish, but Contreras would cost a lot.
  2. The Angels can probably get Darvish without giving up much in return if they take on his entire salary, especially if the Cubs are really looking to cut payroll as reports suggest. Maybe the Angels can get Contreras and Darvish in a trade centered around Marsh? They’d obviously need to add way more, but it could be a start.
  3. That’d probably cost close to $40 million per year. I think it’s far more likely that it’s going to be Kluber + a trade for a good, but cheap starter.
  4. My dream offseason would be Darvish, Gray and Contreras. Not sure if any of this is too feasible, though (they probably won’t give them away without the Angels trading a lot of good prospects, at least). Kluber, Contreras and Gray sounds nice, too.
  5. Jon Gray is cheap. Just something to keep in mind.
  6. Interesting. I kinda figured Fletcher wouldn’t be involved. He’s way too valuable to give up.
  7. Or let them have him, while the Angels trade for Contreras instead.
  8. Exactly. It’s a risk, and it may or may not work out. If Eppler does trade for Kluber, I’ll be hoping it’s for Rengifo instead.
  9. I would be far more content with it if we actually knew we’d be getting the actual Kluber and not an imposter with his name only.
  10. He’s making league minimum, is under club control for many years, can play multiple positions, and is at worst a league average player (with room for more). Those guys are very valuable.
  11. 4.88 xFIP, though. But the sample size was small.
  12. Fletcher is super valuable, though. I’d rather they trade Rengifo.
  13. I’d prefer certainty tbh. But yeah, if Kluber pitches anything resembling the 2018 Kluber then it’d be a coup. I doubt that Kluber will be the only addition they make for the rotation, though. Hopefully Eppler will look for some near certainty just incase.
  14. Sure, but he’s also more risky. Nobody knows which version of Kluber we’ll get (the ace or the damaged goods).
  15. If they’re going to trade Fletcher, I would hope it’d be for someone like Jon Gray instead (and I still wouldn’t trade Fletcher). Kluber is too risky (though the reward can be huge, obviously).
  16. Not sure if Keuchel would even be necessary at that point. Darvish/Ohtani/Gray/Heaney/Bundy/Canning would be more than fine.
  17. Darvish, Contreras and Gray would be my dream offseason. I think the Angels can clearly afford it, too (Contreras and Gray are cheap).
  18. Darvish, Gray and a catcher? I think Eppler should seriously look into trading for Gray (cheap, groundballs galore, good K/BB numbers, etc. and would probably be way better away from Coors)
  19. Yea...he'd be much better than a lot of the other options being mentioned. Plus he doesn't cost much, which will allow the Angels more flexibility to keep improving.
  20. I would LOVE for the Angels to trade for Gray. He's not making much, gets a lot of groundballs, and has good strikeout/walk numbers. I wonder what it would take to get him, though?
×
×
  • Create New...