TobiasFunke

If the article is about how terrorism isn't just acted out by the baddies with beard in the Middle East but now possibly the teen next door and how does a selfie taking teenager in America become a terrorist, I would put the glamour selfie on the cover also. It goes with the content of the article which most people seem to not pay attention to.

We'll let them peek their head in here and speak for themselves if there are any

Lawrence says, "deal with it bro" every time he pushes the post button

What is sad is people like you really believe that.

Come on MT, you know that people are stoked union/public employees are getting canned.

Great point on Trayvon, Tank.

I also have no problem with the cover nor the article.

Should make a bunch of you on here happy

I wonder if the Nazis had secret courts and sophisticated programs to spy on their own population?

I see what you did there and it was very clever

Graham added, "but I am saying that the Russian government is empowering some of the most evil, hateful people in the world."

.

The U.S. Congress?

Haha exactly

Django Reinhardt > Django Unchained

And this is relevant since Django was French

But is that really what the majority are trying to fight against?

Sigh. I swear, I don't know why anyone would want to be a cop.

But dude, didn't you know it's everyone's fault but their own precious kid...

I expect someone living the thuggery lifestyle to say that.

ya, fn hilarious.

if the shoe fits

with your perspective I guess you're right. And I would say following someone with a gun or baseball bat is an act of thuggery.

When did I say it was illegal to follow someone?

lol @ the use of thug

Sure it's a foolish act, but it happens and we'll disagree that it's a justifiable defensive measure.

And I thought arguing in hypothetical situations was what AW was all about.

Is the second question a serious question? If someone is following me and I go verbally ballistic on them hopefully they'll get scared, stand down and back off. That's the point of verbally defending oneself.

Not sure. I just know its not out of the scopenof teality to get defensive if someone is following you. For some reason you think that one shouldn't.

because Zimmerman was not a stranger in Trayvon's neighborhood. And let's just assume that Trayvon did feel a little bit of a threat being followed, so then he is justified for verbally and physically confronting him?

I would say that if someone is creeping up/following me that I'm justified to defend myself via verbal confrontation.

He didn't profile anyone. An unknown person was walking through the backside of a community that had been having robberies, he was unknown and therefore suspicious. Zimmerman followed him, he didn't confront him. Zimmerman called police. He was confronted by Martin, not the other way around.

If you were being followed by an unknown and suspicious person, you wouldn't want to turn around and confront the person? Maybe get defensive about it?

Just curious, at what point did GZ overstep his bounds? Does anyone have a problem with him calling the police? Obviously getting out of the car set things in motion but there is dispute about whether he headed back to his car or if he followed Martin the entire time.

When he confronted Trayvon is when he officially went too far. Following him I guess you can say he was doing his due diligence as a neighborhood watch guy (and I say that very liberally) but confronting the kid for walking through his neighborhood is the line that was crossed in my opinion.

Loved Paris, hated the food.

Good read.

It's getting serious now. Protesters pushed down a Walmart greeter and now hiding out in the store.

Well you can't blame 'em. The police told them to go home.

BOOM!

When I was 18 I'd tell a girl I liked whatever just to get her cooter