Jump to content

SigBaby

Members
  • Posts

    762
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by SigBaby

  1. As far as the 2017 rotation goes, I'd sign one of the many scrubs out there to take over the 5 spot in the rotation. I'm thinking guys like Jorge De La Rosa, Kris Medlen, Jon Niese, even Weaver and CJ. Each has something of an upside (maybe not Weaver, but if we're considering the other guys we might as well consider him too) and should come cheap. 

    I'd also trade Cron in a deal for a young starter and let Marte take over as the starting 1b/DH. 

    If everyone heals up and stays healthy until next season that gives us

    Richards, Shoemaker, Skaggs, Nolasco, FA, Meyer, Cron Trade which isn't great, but is workable if we're able to shore up the bullpen by signing a real lefty and a reliable 7th inning guy.

  2. Thurs. 9-8: Carolina -3 @ Denver +3

    Sun. 9-11: Buffalo +3 @ Baltimore -3

    Chicago +5.5 @ Houston -5.5

    Cincinnati -2.5 @ NY Jets +2.5

    Cleveland +4 @ Philadelphia -4

    Green Bay -4.5 @ Jacksonville +4.5

    Minnesota -2.5 @Tennessee +2.5

    Oakland +1.5 @ New Orleans -1.5

    San Diego +7 @ Kansas City -7

    Tampa Bay +3 @ Atlanta -3

    Miami +10 @ Seattle -10

    Detroit +3.5 @ Indianapolis -3.5

    NY Giants +1 @ Dallas -1

    New England +6 @ Arizona -6

    Mon. 9-12: Pittsburgh -3 @ Washington +3

    Los Angeles -2.5 @ San Francisco +2.5

  3. 10 hours ago, ScottyA_MWAH said:

    This winter is probably going to be bittersweet for me. I love what Eppler did is positioning Marte and Choi to take over LF or 1B just as soon as they adjusted to major league pitching. Well, they're in the process of adjusting, and it's so cool to see. Perhaps across a full season next year, they could combine for something like .250/.320 and 25 HR's with acceptable D. 

    But with so much money coming off the books, the free agent class having some decent options, and Arte-Eppler's intention to compete, I'm guessing we're going to end up with someone like Fowler or Reddick. It's an upgrade, but it will also mean no more spot for Choi or Marte. To grow so much only to be denied.

    If we were to sign Reddick I think that would make Cron expendable to maybe bring back some pitching. I have no idea how other clubs value him but if he could net a return of a young starter like the Trumbo trade then that option should be considered with Reddick in left field and Marte/Choi putting up similar if not better production than Cron at 1st. 

  4. Just now, Pucknut22 said:

    Oh and pigs fly right.  Santiago for Meyer maybe but taking Nolasco contract and giving another pitching prospect too? Well at least he won't be the worst pitcher on the team Lincecum has that covered. One more move to solidify Trout leaving when his contracts up. 

    We don't have pitching prospects (outside of Nate Smith kind of) to give up and if we did I doubt we'd even consider trading them

  5. Considering Nolasco consistently underperforms based on FIP and Santiago consistently over performs there's definitely potential for them to be a wash and the trade to come down to the development of Meyer. So while we lost out on the market, in my opinion we could possibly come out ahead in the actual trade

  6. Just now, DMVol said:

    How do you figure that?  Santiago has pitched in part of 6 seasons in the bigs to a 3.68 ERA......Meyer is hurt....hasn't cracked the bigs at 26....

    I think the main worry is that Meyers is hurt but Santiago is incredibly inconsistent and has always outperformed his peripherals which is probably a big reason why no other team wanted to trade for him. Remember we almost swung a deal last offseason for Brian Matusz a lefty reliever other teams dont seem to value him much and i just dont think he'll ever become a consistent starter

  7. 2 minutes ago, eaterfan said:

    I think this is the second worst trade of the 2000 behind only the Wells trade. I'm not even under the impression that Santiago was good. He's probably a 4-5 starter on a decent team but at least he has a little upside and is semi cheap. We just took on an expensive 5 starter with only downside and a minor leaguer who is most likely a bust. I have no problem with the Angels taking a flier on some guys but then don't trade for a guy in his mid 30s.

    Nolasco's not an expensive starter though I'm not sure how much we will be paying him but it's certainly nowhere near his full contract. And yes it's great to receive "highly rated" prospects, but the shine wears off very quickly and sometimes unfairly. Look at Wil Meyers who's coming into his own a couple years after the shine wore off. Or Brandon Wood who never did. Or Shoemaker and Calhoun who never were prospects at all. 

  8. 4 minutes ago, CanadianHalo said:

    Could've signed a Nolasco type pitcher in the offseason for the same amount of money and Santiago (as much as I don't like him) is more than likely better than Meyer will ever be

    So this trade was completely pointless and a waste of an asset 

    The only thing Santiago could ever consistently do was outperform his peripherals. Theres no reason why Meyer can't become a decent starter hes only a year removed from being a highly regarded prospect

  9. Just looking at the statistics though I think if Meyer is healthy he can perform at Santiago's level they're actually similar pitchers in regards to control issues but good stuff. 

    My opinion of this trade is we basically got a guy who is as much of a toss up as Santiago is going forward, but cheaper and controllable for longer. On top of that we got a 5 starter for next year so we won't have to discuss re-signing Weaver anymore

  10. I don't understand the hate for Meyer he hasn't even been given a chance in the majors and was a top prospect not long ago. Santiago has shown only that he is inconsistent and couldn't be relied upon for anything. That being said I do think we couldve gotten a better return given how the market has played out

  11. It depends on how much money the Twins are sending us but if Nolasco's pretty much free it's not so bad. Of course everything hinges on Meyer turning things around, but if he can and become a #3 starter we just got a 3 and 5 starter for next year. Also, Nolasco is a sinker ball pitcher if I remember correctly and should benefit from having Simmons behind him. He's also consistentyl pitched worse than his peripherals suggest so maybe there's some improvement there

  12. Of course not I'm saying as a result of the entire deadline receive a relief arm or two as parts of the package in deals for Smith, Yunel, or Bedrosian. 

     

    I personally hate the idea of trading multiple young prospects for a non-elite relief pitcher just because of how much the results fluctuate and how few innings they pitch so we might as well try to capitalize on the market now with Bedrosian. 

  13. Either way hopefully we can net a reliever or two in the return who can help in the near future. This bullpen needs a complete makeover the only guys I want to be remain in it if Bedrosian is traded are Street, Guerra, Morin if he shows any flashes in September and maybe Chacin as he's done well as a long man and should be able to be re-signed for cheap. 

  14. I'd say start remaking the bullpen now by getting an arm or two and trade Yunel and Santiago while their values are high. The offense is fine revolving around Calhoun, Trout, and Pujols and Cowart will add to a very good defense. Good Bullpen, ok starters, great defense, and a solid offense would probably be enough to compete next year.

  15. Maybe we could see a mix of buying and selling. The bullpen very clearly needs to be rebuilt and we might as well start by adding a decent controllable righty who can help next year too and maybe a rental lefty who can actually get lefties out so we can get rid of Alvarez. We saw the lift that adding Grilli had for our bullpen and adding a couple decent arms would improve it drastically. I think Santiago's value is at a good enough level where we can get a solid return for him. Let's be honest his last couple games have been great, but we know how incredibly inconsistent he is and I don't see him turning any corners. I've really liked what I've seen out of Bandy and Perez is capable as a backup so maybe Soto could be traded as well but I don't see us netting anything significant for him. 

    In short add a rental lefty (Boone Logan, Mark Rzepcynski), controllable righty (Ryan Pressly, Michael Tonkin (Twins), Kevin Quackenbush (Padres)) none of whom should cost very much prospect-wise. 

    And trade Santiago for a solid haul as well as potentially lesser chips like Soto, Nava, and Alvarez. 

     

  16. Now can we just call up Ortega and give Nava Choi's spot on the bench as pinch hitter and day off for Cron against righties? Nava seems much better suited for a role like that and it would get Ortega regular ab's to prove himself.

  17. For guys who get paid millions of dollars and are the best hitters in the entire world to simply wait back on a pitch and hit it the other way to beat the shift? I really don't understand it. I mean it makes sense for power hitters because they're trying to make as big of an impact as they can on the game but for complementary players like Giavotella i really don't understand it

×
×
  • Create New...