Jump to content

AZMike

Members
  • Posts

    2,786
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by AZMike

  1. And you know what's funny? Some people still swear that Management/Coaching is not the problem.

     

    But I don't think its a coincidence that Terry Francona goes to a new team and gets them into the playoffs. The guy does not accept bad baseball.

     

    And here we are playing bad baseball for 4 f***ing years and at some point there needs to be some accountability.

     

    Playing like this is completely unnacceptable.

     

    Scioscia should have been "asked to resign" after the 2008 playoffs, not given a 10 year extension

  2. I'm sure Tampa Bay and Cleveland have a new most-hated franchise after this series. If the Angels can't even pull one win out of this series they can all go **** themselves. Even Trout. He has sucked for weeks.

    The unbalanced schedule really sucks for teams like TB and Cleveland. They don't get the luxury of 38 games against the Angels and the Astros.

  3. Is it Cleveland wins 2 and Texas loses 2 for the Rangers to be eliminated?

     

    Rangers Magic # for WC Elimination is 4...

    Yep. Alternatively there's a pretty decent chance the Rangers end up in a tie with Cleveland and would need to win a one game playoff just to get in to the one game wild card.  

  4. The Rangers now know that they are 1 game back of Cleveland and 2 games in back of TB with 4 games to play.

    The Halos taking 2 out of 4 games in Arlington would likely end the Rangers 2013 season.

    TB will not lose 4 straight to close the season, and I don't see Cleveland losing 3 out of 4 to a very bad Twins team.

    It's quite possible we might see an Indians - Rangers tiebreaker game just to get into the wild card game against Tampa. 

     

    For example the Halos might only take 1 of 4 and Cleveland might split. If the second wild card team ended up finally winning, going into the real playoffs with two pitchers already spent could be pretty crippling. 

  5. Also, before everyone digs out their pitchforks and torches to storm the Angels office, it is not the off season when all of these negotiations begin to take form. Trout's agent is his own worst enemy right now by pushing an agenda that is still months away from the bagaining table. He is like the kid in the back seat asking every two minutes, "are we there yet?"

     

    Trout's Agent is worried he's going to be fired and replaced by some other Agent before he gets commission on Trout's big money contracts.

     

     

    I don't understand why they can't create a back-loaded contract, one that kicks in with big dollars in 2017 when Weaver and Wilson come off the books. Something like this:

     

    2014: $5M

    2015: $10M

    2016: $15M

    2017: $20M

    2018+: $30M (free agency years)

     

    That way Trout makes more money over the next four years than he would otherwise make, is still guaranteed a big contract for his free agency years, and the Angels lock him up before he hits free agency.

     

    I suppose they could also wait until he's arbitration eligible so the difference won't be as extreme. Either way, what they don't want to do is wait until the end of the 2017 season and have Trout facing free agency.

    As was mentioned by some others, luxury tax is based on the average annual value of contracts of players on the team. Cash compensation paid in trades also counts against the luuxry tax. That means 2/3rds of Vernon Wells' salary coutns against the Angels for luxury tax purposes. The Angels are actually *just* under the tax cutoff.

     

    Since there are serious penalties for going over multiple consecutive years, what will likely happen is they will sign Trout to a long contract after the 2014 season. That's when Vernon Wells money goes off the books. And in that case, they'd actually be better off signing him to a very long term (like 15 years) deal, with a huge lump sum paid in year one. Average annual value would be low but a huge payoff up front (like $40m or more )  would be hard to refuse compared to arbitration. 

×
×
  • Create New...