No I am not being a jerk, but the guy with the most trade value is clearly Trout.
Trout would get you more then Trumbo, Kendrick and Aybar combined.
The Yankees would give us their farm system for him.
None of us, or anyone one else in their right mind would trade Trout.
I think we should trade Kendrick/Aybar or both. Trumbo is iffy, a 30hr/100rbi guy does not fall out of the sky everyday or everyone would have one. I have always been a Bourjos fan and think we have a better outfield with him in it and potentially a better offense too. Depending on the return I think you make all of them available. I think Ianetta is overvalued by some, but I agree that there are a few teams who would want a guy like Ianetta.
If the Dodgers don't win the WS this year than a trade for Lee if far more likely. I would not trade Trumbo unless we are getting a ++ starting pitcher in return. You keep Bourjos because he is still cost controlled and unlikely to bring a return equal to his value if healthy.
Vargas I think will re-sign. He may not give the hometown discount, but I tend to think the Angels will have first chance to reel him back in.
Richards to me has proven he is a major league quality starter.
The bullpen is the weak link, a return of Williams to the bullpen if we find a quality starter who can produce better than Williams (which the Angels have not managed to accomplish now in two full years), would help, I think Frieri is acceptable so long as you can live with the occasional week long grease fire he seems to turn into, you may not like the comparison but how much better was Troy Percival?
De La Rosa has been a good find, although he is essentially Brendan Donnelly 2.0, what we dont have is Scot Shields 2.0.
In 2002 our rotation was
Washburn
Appier
Schoeneweis (later replaced in rotation by John Lackey)
Sele
Ortiz
You can't tell me we cannot field a rotation equal to or better than that next year.