Orange Lives Matter

1 minute ago, fishbulb said:

No, I didn't mention either you or stickboy.

Ha Ha once again... EVERY TIME I post something the first person to Reply RIGHT AWAY is Fish-STICK... Brah why so obsessed with me?

Check... mate

cant wait for Fish-STICK to reply for to this one too

2 minutes ago, calscuf said:

Is the clown st1ckboy?

So you’re saying the clown is a 40 something year old with the mental capacity, reading skills and education of a 12 year old??

11 minutes ago, Tank said:

no thanks. tank or tanker is just fine.

What about Tank Daddy?... like Pimp Daddy but with Tank?

24 minutes ago, calscuf said:

I know you did.  I/we watched the game “together”.

So you’re not gonna say anything about me wishing a PitBull rips your taint off?

24 minutes ago, Tank said:

just when I was trying to decide if I liked tea dogger or tea doggy best, you threw this knuckler into the mix. knock it off.

If you want Tank you can be Tanko’saurus

15 minutes ago, calscuf said:

The angels won 5-4 in the 10th.

Two things Cal...

One... I hope a PitBull rips off your taint one of these days

Two... I already knew the score 

6 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

A little common courtesy?

It’s a test Dawgo’saurus... I wanna see who the good people are (the ones that don’t tell) and who the Mother Fuckers are (you know those straw man fuckers)

I DVR’d it... don’t tell me the score 

15 minutes ago, fishbulb said:

Well, you know how he NO LONGER ALLOWED Epstein to use his property after they had a falling out after battling for a property and Epstein getting busted by another club member who threatened to drag Trump into the mess? It's the opposite of that, in which he knowingly let (ALLOWED) Epstein operations to occur on his property for years.

You gotta own your love of the pedo enabler.

AGAIN where’s your verified proof?...

Show me this “STORY” you’re telling me is true from a verified source (and I don’t mean NPR by verified... shoutout to the Dogski on that one)

8 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

You are the absolute master of creating strawmen. 

I just want ya to know if I’ve ever see you in person I’M GONNA HUG YOU REAL HARD AND NOT LET GO FOR A WHILE!!!

16 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

So they "went on the airwaves"? I just see two tweets. The one by Kitty Eisele is problematic, but I fail to see the issue with the other tweet. But again, not seeing this being said "on the airwaves".

Yup Yup Tea Doggy they were on tv, radio and then podcast form being bias in their reporting... 

Doggy Dogg it’s okay Brah...

I get it, ya thought NPR was perfect and clean but they weren’t... you spoke just for talking sake and well here we are... 

Tell ya what keep me posted on any other unbiased news source ya come across... and thank you for this one  

7 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

I have no idea who the fuck any of these people are. 

These are on air NPR reporters... earlier you said I was too focused on articles... well here’s a couple RECENT bias NPR reporting moments... oh and these reporters have their on air reports also in podcast form

49 minutes ago, fishbulb said:

This post is a very distinct kind of high horse whiny combined with a ... infused sentence structure that I've seen one board member bring to this forum time and time again. I see you, _ _ _ _ _ _ _.

Hey FishSTICK I’m still waiting for the proof you said you had... so tone down your emotions and back your claims from earlier about “ALLOWING”

Also a few weeks ago NPR did that bias fake ON AIR news report where they edited footage of showing a car hitting a black guy saying ON AIR that it was a white suprematists attack...

Well a few hours later the full video was published and it showed a stop car getting bum rushed by a mob of angry black rioters and the driver driving away to save her life

https://twitter.com/TimRunsHisMouth/status/1274744317802876930

1 hour ago, tdawg87 said:

You're still focused on articles. I listen to NPR podcasts.

But for the sake of what you posted, there's absolutely nothing contradictory there. They're literally saying the same thing: Despite Pandemic, WHO believes that public protests are important. Despite Pandemic, Trump is restarting his political rallies. Everything you said is your own conjecture.

Tea sorry to break this to you but just a few weeks ago a few NPR reporters went on the air waves encouraging antifa to attack Trump Hotels in the DC area

Credit to ONE (not all of their reporters) she did apologize... granted reporters shouldn’t be ENCOURAGING VIOLENCE 

https://mobile.twitter.com/omriceren/status/1269714383170658304

11 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

Fox is fine.

I mean, it's not. But if you're conservative and want accurate reporting on the actual news then that's where you should go.

I don't like any of the cable news outlets. But I do like NPR and PBS Newshour.

Not looking to be argumentative... there’s many inconsistencies with NPR’s reporting as well...

Just a few weeks ago (on the same day) they used the SAME COVID STATS in TWO DIFFERENT ARTICLES to justify RIOTING and LOOTING while also condemning Trumps rally

It’s funny how Everyone is so quick to discredit shit... and yet have no solutions or alternative options to said discredited problem 

2 minutes ago, UndertheHalo said:

Go to Fox News.  If you don’t want people to bitch at you don’t post editorials. 

Great thank you for the recommendation Halo (no sarcasm) greatly appreciate you stepping up and saying something 

1 minute ago, calscuf said:

Now I that I think about it, I think it’s probably me. 

Cute... now let the adults talk

1 minute ago, UndertheHalo said:

What if you just don’t read editorials or opinion pieces for news ? Most of the major news outlets, including Fox News actual newsroom reporting is decently accurate.  It’s on you to be able to understand when you’re reading an opinion.  The issue is that much is heavily, heavily editorialized.  
 

now if we’re talking about breitbart or something, that’s different.  They don’t have actual newsrooms.  But it’s not difficult to identify these parties.  

Once again everyone is talking about how this source is no good and providing no options of what’s a better source to follow

1 minute ago, calscuf said:

I think maybe he’s Lou.

And I think you’re a one Schtick Pony

7 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

There is no perfect news source. But I prefer ones that don't lean to one extreme or the other and don't perpetuate conspiracy bullshit. 

So that rules out CNN, MSNBC, and SLATE. 

And also Thegatewaypundit.

Okay if it’s not them.. then who?... you talk a lot on these subjects so you must be getting your info from somewhere... let me know where I need to go then

3 minutes ago, calscuf said:

“The website was founded by Jim Hoft in 2004 to “speak the truth” and to “expose the wickedness of the left.”

Maybe this dude isn’t Brian.  Maybe he’s Jim Hoft.

Cal can you ever do anything besides claiming me being someone else all the time... dude seriously this schtick is really becoming really old and boring

11 minutes ago, tdawg87 said:

 

 

So the link you posted is trying to claim my source is no good... and I’m just pointing out how all source can be viewed as bad...

Once again where does the Tea Dogger think I should go to get my viable sources of information?