juansavage1

Cathloic social justice, while undeniably a sexy term, doesn't sound progressive or marxist.

Conspiracy theories against liberals are boring. I'm more interested in why people who only want peace keep getting assassinated.

It was the original social justice. It's pretty middle of the road economically. The concept of subsidiarity is interesting as well. Basically, things should be done at the level closest to the people as possible, with the closest being the family.

I wouldn't **** this bitch with Juan's dick.

I would bone her, but only after a stern lecture. 

Well the dudes that would date her would have to be completely spineless.  

 

Getting laid is important but a woman with an attitude like this should not be able to even find ANY guy to tolerate her.  The fact that she can is disappointing.

 

C'mon dudes, have a little self respect.   Jack off or f*ck hookers, but don't let an uppity bitch like this push you around just so you can get a little tang.

Most of these people grow out of it. I used to believe the same crap in college. 

I've always had the feeling that Juan is a black chick.

The good thing is that I am no longer bound by my birth identity-extremely sexy Cuban dude.

Have you guys ever wondered how there can be whole cities where the minority of people have a working head of household while, at the same time, millions of people with no skills (not a knock on them, just a fact) or knowledge of the language come here, work, and are able to live more or less a decent life? 

Global warming fulfills every criteria on the list. It's an unsolvable non-problem with the right good and bad guys. 

To the subject at hand:

-Free market thought use Adam Smith and a few famous economists as their source. A few use Ayn Rand. You can't understand them fully without being familiar with those works. Leftists like Foucault. Obama has mentioned him as an influence. 

-A stupid philosophy can ruin an otherwise smart person. That may be what happened to the author of the article. What kind of relationship is going to last if each person is constantly checking to see who has an unjust amount of power or who's oppressing whom?

This chick dates Mexicans either because of some weird white shame, she's trying to piss her father off or it makes her feel cool/progressive.

Here's something interesting for you white guys. Mexican girls from Mexico love white dudes. They think they're more calm and nicer. Hispanics from Hispanic countries also tend to value lighter skin more than Americans do. If you notice the Mexican soap operas (and if you're straight, you should), almost everybody is white in a country where only a small percentage are. Mexican girls raised in the US don't like white guys as much. 

Juan, you are not to post entire articles, it refuses the author and source their revenue. Please only start your OP with a small quote of what you may think is a good conversation starter then provide a link so that the readers are redirected to the source and the Web hits are properly shared.

No problem. I'll post the link only. 

Again, another Juan-favorited website that no board lefties would ever have found on their own.

You wouldn't go on it. I'm showing where ideas come from. Of course, they're packaged differently for different audiences. 

I won't belabor the point, either.  I won't mention it anymore in threads. I think it's necessary to understand the motivation for ideas. Christian Democrats get their ideas from Catholic social justice. If you want to understand them, you go to the source. If you want to understand whoever, you go to the source of ideas.

Sorry for the double post. I'll stop saying "anyways" if it bugs people. That's the way I talk. 

MOVING ALONG, 

You should really go to the site "everyday feminism," where I got this from.  It has examples of everything I talk about. See if you can spot the themes (Hint: Power, power, power. Equality, equality, equality. oppression, oppression, oppression). 

http://everydayfeminism.com/2015/08/white-person-dating-poc/

I want to learn more about how the Marxist assumption invades my life and retards me, but no way I am reading all that. 

Just read the bold parts. Once you get the basics down, you can see how it colors every left conversation. 

Juan is the only poster here who could have found this article. How did you come across it, by the way? I'm sure it was a purely innocent search.

Twitter. Anyways, it goes with a theme of mine. 

Seriously, the reason I posted this is because it perfectly illustrates how Marxist assumption invades every day life and makes people retarded. Notice the preoccupation with power, equality, and oppression. These concepts started first with economics, but is now mostly the realm of gender and race. 

Damn straight. Left wing conspriracy to steal our SUVs from us so our kids grow up driving around in compact cross-overs and become communist homosexuals.

Dont take no brain surgeon to connect the dots, morans.

You'll be sorry when you're all hot and shit from the global warming. 

https://youtu.be/UXodRLLkth4

or

IME, uber drivers are worse than taxi drivers. It wasn't easy but they achieved it. And their cars are in significantly worse condition. Self driving cars can't get here fast enough.

First, is there any evidence of this? 

Wait.

Argentinians hate America?

Not Argentinians. Leftists all over the wotld have some level of antipathy towards America, including the ones who live here.

Islamists hate America too.

In both cases, America stands in their way.

Really, dudes. If you can't say communists and Marxists (think of Bill Ayers and your buddy, the Chicano Studies major) hate America, you're the one with the problem.

I think we can hash this out if there's a real problem. C'mon!

What I meant by number five is that it has to be easy virtue. For example, what's harder for Hollywood types: stay married, work in soup kitchens (I don't do this,so I'm not claiming I'm better), stick around to sign autographs, and give money away without attending a party OR drink ethical water, drive a Tesla, oppose a pipeline, wear plastic belts and shoes, call police "murderers"** and support gay marriage? What do you think gives them more pride in 2015?

**while living in rich areas with low crime.

I still think it's gender and enironmentalism for now. Think of all the culture of rape things, slut shaming, body image, trans, and generally things pertaining to rich women and people of odd sexuality.

I have to concede #5 as fact. But #5 kind of applies to anyone who thinks they definitively know whats best for people.

Some nobility requires sacrifice. I'm thinking about some family situations, some military, actually helping poor people, missionaries.

We can actually come to an agreement. What problem will the regulation solve? At what cost?