Jump to content

Lifetime

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,482

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Lifetime

  1. Lifetime
    We traded our starting CF not our 4th OF
  2. Lifetime
    STL got the value in this deal. This deal didn't need to happen now and netted a negative.
  3. Lifetime
    there's plenty of factual basis behind it which has been discussed here several times. both teams essentially gave up a minor league player.
  4. Lifetime
    then you shouldn't be happy with this trade, unless you're a cardinals fan of course
  5. Lifetime
    uh OK, good logic
  6. Lifetime
  7. Lifetime
    Keith Law is FOS
  8. Lifetime
    wow, someone is really reaching here
  9. Lifetime
    not really in Bourjos' case.
  10. Lifetime
    I agree sort of. I don't think this trade addresses our primary need but the return value is my biggest issue with it, not that he was traded.
  11. Lifetime
    I don't put Calhoun above Bourjos at this point, so if both are on the team, Bourjos gets more playing time as the higher overall value to the team. Like I said before, if you're not going to get a like value in return, and I think anyone trying to argue we did in this case comes up well short, then don't trade him now. You especially don't jump into an early trade season deal if your return is poor. This is a bad deal.
  12. Lifetime
    why couldn't he? Did you see how well he was doing before he hit the DL? Bourjos can play. He's a very good player that has a much higher long term value than what we got in return.
  13. Lifetime
    except PB wasn't a 4th OF.
  14. Lifetime
    no it wasn't implied. And your assessment of Bourjos is lacking. The Cards came out like a rose in this deal.
  15. Lifetime
    what does this have to do with anti-trust?
  16. Lifetime
    and floplag
  17. Lifetime
    LOL! no I didn't.
  18. Lifetime
    this trade has arte's fingerprints all over it?
  19. Lifetime
    not a fact
  20. Lifetime
    NO CHUCK, YOU SAID WE WOULD HAVE BEEN GOING INTO THE SEASON WITHOUT A 3B WHICH IS PATENTLY FALSE! We traded low to marginally upgrade a spot that wasn't a priority. We did not get the value end of this deal.
  21. Lifetime
    no flop, it isn't a priority. We have a defensive option there that isn't a great offensive option. But offense isn't our big need on this team so replacing that defensive specialist 3B with a mediocre 3B with better offense isn't a priority move. Oh, and I don't think anyone here is claiming Bourjos would have netted us a real valuable SP.
  22. Lifetime
    there is nothing to indicate he would be perpetually injury prone
  23. Lifetime
    Damn straight I would. He's a better defender with a good bat when healthy. I would absolutely put him out there over Calhoun.
  24. Lifetime
    oh puleese Chuck. 3B is not a big problem here. We don't have great options there right now, but that is low on the priority list. Offense is NOT the issue this team needs to address. We made a marginal upgrade in a position that wasn't critical while trading low on a very good player.
  25. Lifetime
    Then don't f'ing trade him now if you're not going to get a like valued return. It's a stupid move plain and simple.
×
×
  • Create New...