WicketMaiden

Hey, @PattyD22,  Lou got me into CFB over the past couple of years, we used to PM during games too. I had my first big Bruins almost-but-not-quite season last year. I'll be cheering for them again this year. Feel free to PM me on game days, mate. You can call me a dumbass when I talk nonsense, too.

i had no idea you walked so slowly.

I stopped to pee.

Sounds a little more like 12 years into the marriage. 😉

Yes, that was a great game. A typical top CFB type of match with both teams going all out for the win on 4th downs and with 2 point conversion attempts. And it wasn't that the defenses were bad, Oregon's in particular rushed the Washington QB time and again to get the ball back quickly, it was that they were facing high quality QB's with some excellent receivers and a tiny little running back with the lowest centre of gravity I've ever seen. Great fun to watch, and I thought whichever team lost could feel a little unlucky. CFB at its best.
The Bruins after that were a bit of a let-down.
 

If there is a metric that has the Angels and Dodgers as equal the last two years, then that metric should be taken with a giant grain of salt.  It shouldn’t be used as a reason to say that Minasian is awful, nor should it be used to say well he isn’t awful if he is tied with Friedman.  The metric should be ignored.  

And in the same article, by the same metric, Minasian's regime is tied 22nd along with Friedman and Gomes of the much lauded Dodgers. Interesting, don't you think?

And in the same article, by the same metric, Minasian's regime is tied 22nd along with Friedman and Gomes of the much lauded Dodgers. Interesting, don't you think?

And in the same article, by the same metric, Minasian's regime is tied 22nd along with Friedman and Gomes of the much lauded Dodgers. Interesting, don't you think?

He almost got 5 to 10.

Nonsense. Corporations recognise talent, they spend fortunes acquiring it and even more to keep it in house. If you are good at your job and you perform well, you don't get fired or humiliated with a demotion.
'Air cover' is only required if you're not very good at your job.

Nonsense. Corporations recognise talent, they spend fortunes acquiring it and even more to keep it in house. If you are good at your job and you perform well, you don't get fired or humiliated with a demotion.
'Air cover' is only required if you're not very good at your job.

Nonsense. Corporations recognise talent, they spend fortunes acquiring it and even more to keep it in house. If you are good at your job and you perform well, you don't get fired or humiliated with a demotion.
'Air cover' is only required if you're not very good at your job.

Nonsense. Corporations recognise talent, they spend fortunes acquiring it and even more to keep it in house. If you are good at your job and you perform well, you don't get fired or humiliated with a demotion.
'Air cover' is only required if you're not very good at your job.

The rest of the time is spent thinking about the Roman Empire 

Never ceases to amaze me that people on this site can be on the same side on an issue and still fight. 

They don't have doors on their offices, too expensive.

Somewhere, a poster sheds a tear.